Preview of Member Only Content
For full access: or Become a Member
Reviews in Review
By Ellen S. Podgor
Reviews in Review columns.
George D. Brown, Counterrevolution? — National Criminal Law After Raich, 66 Ohio State Law Journal 947 (2005):
United States v. Lopez and United States v. Morrison were decisions that proved helpful to criminal defense arguments regarding federalism issues. From these cases were seen limits to how far the federal government could go in having criminal statutes that controlled state activities.
The Supreme Court in Gonzales v. Raich, a 6-3 decision, was not as assisting to criminal defense lawyers, as the decision allowed federal law to regulate intrastate commerce more broadly. But how far did the Raich decision go; how many of the “old” arguments still remain; and how can this new decision be used to advance the defense federalism arguments? Professor George D. Brown does a wonderful job of examining these questions and provides analysis that can assist enormously in distinguishing these cases.
After dissecting the Raich decision, he explores how this case affects the “curr
Want to read more?
The Champion archive is reserved for NACDL members.
NACDL members, please login to read the rest of this article.
Not a member? Join now.
Or click here to see an overview of NACDL Member benefits.
See what NACDL members say about us.
To read the current issue of The Champion in its entirety, click here.
- Media inquiries: Contact NACDL's Director of Public Affairs & Communications Ivan J. Dominguez at 202-465-7662 or firstname.lastname@example.org
- Academic Requests: Full articles of The Champion Magazine are available for academic and research purposes in the WestLaw and LexisNexis databases.