☰ In this section

The Champion

April 2009 , Page 53 

Search the Champion Looking for something specific?

Preview of Member Only Content

For full access: login or Become a Member Join Now


By Christopher R. Clifton

Procuring the Parsimony Provision of § 3553(a) Through Expert And Lay Witnesses

Gall1 and Kimbrough2 signaled a potential sea change in federal sentencing, and several significant subsequent cases mandate that defense counsel provide sentencing courts with evidence upon which those courts can hang their proverbial hats. As all federal practitioners are aware, Gall held that a district court does not abuse its discretion by basing a below-guidelines sentence on offender characteristics. Equally important — and more deadly to the “guidelines-light” approach still resorted to by trial and circuit courts — is Kimbrough, which held that a district court does not abuse its discretion when it bases a below-guidelines sentence on disparities caused by the guidelines themselves.

Recently, the court in Spears v. United States3 reiterated the principles enunciated in Kimbrough. The district court recalculated Spears’ offense level based on a 20:1 crack-to-powder ratio. The Eighth Circuit (which als

Want to read more?

The Champion archive is reserved for NACDL members.

NACDL members, please login to read the rest of this article.

Not a member? Join now.
Join Now
Or click here to see an overview of NACDL Member benefits.

See what NACDL members say about us.

To read the current issue of The Champion in its entirety, click here.

  • Media inquiries: Contact NACDL's Director of Public Affairs & Communications Ivan J. Dominguez at 202-465-7662 or idominguez@nacdl.org
  • Academic Requests: Full articles of The Champion Magazine are available for academic and research purposes in the WestLaw and LexisNexis databases.
Advertisement Advertise with Us

In This Section

Advertisement Advertise with Us