☰ In this section

The Champion

July 2010 , Page 24 

Search the Champion Looking for something specific?

Preview of Member Only Content

For full access: login or Become a Member Join Now

Strength Through Structure: Constructing Winning Closing Arguments With Classical Form

By Jaime Escuder

Form: Hallmark of the Enduring

When asked to explain the role that form plays in his compositions, classical guitarist and composer David Leisner said: “Form is very important to me because I feel that if you hang the content of what you have to say on some kind of form, whether it is an established form like a sonata, or a new form, or a form that you may not quite be able to articulate, but can sense tangibly, then your piece is more enduring.”1 

Similarly, lawyers can rely upon form to help their arguments endure. After all, a winning argument is one that persists in the minds of the jurors during their deliberations; it is the one that sympathetic jurors repeatedly invoke when other jurors consider the merits of the opponent’s position.2 By delivering their points in a logical structure, lawyers assist sympathetic jurors by providing them with arguments that are memorable, logical, and easy to articulate.

Nonetheless, many trial lawyers deliver formless argum

Want to read more?

The Champion archive is reserved for NACDL members.

NACDL members, please login to read the rest of this article.

Not a member? Join now.
Join Now
Or click here to see an overview of NACDL Member benefits.

See what NACDL members say about us.

To read the current issue of The Champion in its entirety, click here.

  • Media inquiries: Contact NACDL's Director of Public Affairs & Communications Ivan J. Dominguez at 202-465-7662 or idominguez@nacdl.org
  • Academic Requests: Full articles of The Champion Magazine are available for academic and research purposes in the WestLaw and LexisNexis databases.
Advertisement Advertise with Us

In This Section

Advertisement Advertise with Us