☰ In this section

The Champion

September/October 2010 , Page 49 

Search the Champion Looking for something specific?

Preview of Member Only Content

For full access: login or Become a Member Join Now

Honest Services

By Ross H. Garber

Many Questions Remain for Honest Services Doctrine

The Supreme Court has now limited the scope of the “honest services” provision of the federal mail and wire fraud laws, 18 U.S.C. § 1346.1 In Skilling v. United States,2 the Court held that the honest services statute, which had become a sort of prosecutorial Swiss Army knife, is now applicable only to bribery and kickback schemes and does not criminalize more amorphous unseemly conduct such as undisclosed self-dealing. Given that limitation, the Court determined that the honest services provision is not unconstitutionally vague. According to the Court in Skilling, “[a] criminal defendant who participated in a bribery or kickback scheme … cannot tenably complain about prosecution under § 1346 on vagueness grounds.”3 So the Supreme Court has brought clarity to honest services issues? Maybe not so much. The following are some initial reflections on the state of honest services law.

Bribery and Kickbacks in State G

Want to read more?

The Champion archive is reserved for NACDL members.

NACDL members, please login to read the rest of this article.

Not a member? Join now.
Join Now
Or click here to see an overview of NACDL Member benefits.

See what NACDL members say about us.

To read the current issue of The Champion in its entirety, click here.

  • Media inquiries: Contact NACDL's Director of Public Affairs & Communications Ivan J. Dominguez at 202-465-7662 or idominguez@nacdl.org
  • Academic Requests: Full articles of The Champion Magazine are available for academic and research purposes in the WestLaw and LexisNexis databases.
Advertisement Advertise with Us

In This Section

Advertisement Advertise with Us