☰ In this section

The Champion

November/December 2008 , Page 44 

Search the Champion Looking for something specific?

Preview of Member Only Content

For full access: login or Become a Member Join Now

Challenging Firearms and Toolmark Identification -- Part Two

By Adina Schwartz

Firearms and Toolmark Identifications Cannot Be Made to a Reasonable Degree of Scientific Certainty

A report by the National Research Council Committee to Assess the Feasibility, Accuracy, and Technical Capability of a National Ballistics Database (the NRC Report) explicitly recognized that firm statistical foundations do not exist for firearms and toolmark examination. “Conclusions drawn in firearms identification should not be made to imply the presence of a firm statistical basis when none has been demonstrated.”1 According to the committee, the tendency of examiners “to cast their assessments in bold absolutes, commonly asserting that a match can be made ‘to the exclusion of all other firearms in the world’ … cloak[s] an inherently subjective assessment of a match with an extreme probability statement that has no firm grounding and unrealistically implies an error rate of zero.”2 

Although its criticism of “extreme probability statements” is welcome, the com

Want to read more?

The Champion archive is reserved for NACDL members.

NACDL members, please login to read the rest of this article.

Not a member? Join now.
Join Now
Or click here to see an overview of NACDL Member benefits.

See what NACDL members say about us.

To read the current issue of The Champion in its entirety, click here.

  • Media inquiries: Contact NACDL's Director of Public Affairs & Communications Ivan J. Dominguez at 202-465-7662 or idominguez@nacdl.org
  • Academic Requests: Full articles of The Champion Magazine are available for academic and research purposes in the WestLaw and LexisNexis databases.
Advertisement Advertise with Us

In This Section

Advertisement Advertise with Us