The Champion

April 2010 , Page 20 

Search the Champion Looking for something specific?

Preview of Member Only Content

For full access: login or Become a Member Join Now

Attorney Fees and Government Forfeiture

By Jon May

White collar practitioners are increasingly confronting efforts by federal prosecutors to seize legal fees that the government claims are proceeds of a defendant’s unlawful conduct. Where successful, such efforts have a dramatic impact upon the defendant’s ability to mount an effective defense. In contrast to drug prosecutions (which are relatively easy to defend, though not so easy to win), business crimes are often complicated and document intensive, and the verdict at trial can turn on intangibles such as a defendant’s ambiguous conduct or the relative credibility of competing experts. Consequently, legal fees and costs can be astronomical and the time and effort needed to prepare and try these cases may be beyond the resources available to court-appointed counsel. Moreover, counsel’s efforts to secure funding for the defense can result in counsel becoming a target of a grand jury investigation into allegations that counsel violated a protective order or engaged in money laundering.

Want to read more?

The Champion archive is reserved for NACDL members.

NACDL members, please login to read the rest of this article.
login

Not a member? Join now.
Join Now
Or click here to see an overview of NACDL Member benefits.

See what NACDL members say about us.

To read the current issue of The Champion in its entirety, click here.

  • Media inquiries: Contact NACDL's Director of Public Affairs & Communications Ivan J. Dominguez at 202-465-7662 or idominguez@nacdl.org
  • Academic Requests: Full articles of The Champion Magazine are available for academic and research purposes in the WestLaw and LexisNexis databases.

In This Section

Advertisement Advertise with Us
ad