Washington, DC (December 1, 2000) -- On the day that attorneys for Texas Governor George W. Bush, the Republican presidential candidate, argue that the federal courts should oversee a state court’s decisions regarding the recent presidential election, Edward Mallett, president of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, issued the following statement:
Today, Governor Bush and his allies understandably turn to the United States Supreme Court for assistance and relief from what they believe to be a wrongful state court decision, harmful to his interests and those of society as a whole. With the election at issue, Governor Bush apparently sees value in federal court review of important state court decisions.
At this time, we call on Governor Bush and Congressional leaders of both parties to take another look at their position regarding the right of others to have federal courts review state court decisions that may be wrong, in matters involving individual life and liberty.
If Mr. Bush has a right to be heard in federal court, it seems unfair to argue that individuals incarcerated in state prisons who seek federal habeas corpus relief should not enjoy the same right. Surely he would agree that the lives of individuals sentenced to death or to languish in prison have at least equal importance to the political fate of a candidate, even for the highest office in our democracy.
Shouldn’t human lives count as much as election results? We urge Governor Bush and his allies--indeed all of the new Congress--to reconsider the fairness of constricting federal court review of state court decisions involving matters of life and liberty. All Americans, including citizens wrongfully imprisoned, deserve meaningful federal court habeas corpus review of flawed state court convictions.
Mallett is a criminal defense lawyer in Houston. He can be reached at (713) 228-1521.
Pattern Cross-Examination of Expert Witnesses: A Trial Strategy & Resource Guide
In a criminal trial, cross-examination of the prosecution’s forensic expert may make the difference between victory or defeat.
2020 Sample Motions Collection Update
NACDL’s 2020 Sample Motions Collection is the follow-up to our wildly popular 2019 Sample Motions Collection and contains the newest and most recent additions to our ever-expanding Sample Motions library.
State v. Stone - A Case Study on Child Sexual Molestation & Sexual Battery
The criminal defense attorney tasked with defending such a case has to be prepared to not only show reasonable doubt, but to answer this question: If it did not happen, how is it that the child believes it did happen?
POZNER ON CROSS: Advanced Cross of Experts & Officers in DUI Cases
It’s not your strong opening argument. It’s not how many of your impassioned objections the judge sustains. It’s not even how you tie your theory of the case together with a dazzling closing statement bow. What wins your trial is your cross.
This is a sponsored ad
Generating Qualified Leads for NACDL Attorneys
NACDL Communications Department
The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers is the preeminent organization advancing the mission of the criminal defense bar to ensure justice and due process for persons accused of crime or wrongdoing. A professional bar association founded in 1958, NACDL's many thousands of direct members in 28 countries – and 90 state, provincial and local affiliate organizations totaling up to 40,000 attorneys – include private criminal defense lawyers, public defenders, military defense counsel, law professors and judges committed to preserving fairness and promoting a rational and humane criminal justice system.