U.S. v. Ursery
Washington, DC (June 24, 1996) -- "I've never seen our nation's highest court do such an abrupt about-face," commented National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL) President Robert Fogelnest today after reading the Supreme Court's dismaying decision in U.S. v. Ursery. "To anyone concerned about the growth of government power beyond constitutional limits, today may be the single saddest day in many terms," Fogelnest said.
Richard J. Troberman, co-chair of NACDL's Forfeiture Abuse Task Force and author of the defense bar's amicus curiae brief in the case, explained: "The Court's decisions in its last four terms have recognized that taking property from citizens because of alleged wrongdoing is punishment. Today all but one of the Justices are saying 'we never said that.'"
"It's unfortunate to see them abandon their own recent precedents and claim that their hands are tied by civil forfeiture law's ancient roots," Troberman commented. "As Justice Thomas recognized just two terms ago, modern forfeiture law 'differs not only in degree, but in kind,' from its historical ancestors," he added.
"This case is not about whether the government can both prosecute a person and take his property; the government has all the authority it needs to do both, as long as it does them in one criminal proceeding," Troberman explained. "This case is about the government going after people on several different fronts, making them defend themselves in multiple, separate proceedings. The Court today has given the government carte blanche to do just that."
"Only Justice Stevens, in his lone dissent, had the intellectual honesty to point out that Americans' Fifth Amendment protections from government overreaching have deeper roots than war-on-drugs statutes that make it easy for the government to take private property," he added.
Pattern Cross-Examination of Expert Witnesses: A Trial Strategy & Resource Guide
In a criminal trial, cross-examination of the prosecution’s forensic expert may make the difference between victory or defeat.
2020 Sample Motions Collection Update
NACDL’s 2020 Sample Motions Collection is the follow-up to our wildly popular 2019 Sample Motions Collection and contains the newest and most recent additions to our ever-expanding Sample Motions library.
State v. Stone - A Case Study on Child Sexual Molestation & Sexual Battery
The criminal defense attorney tasked with defending such a case has to be prepared to not only show reasonable doubt, but to answer this question: If it did not happen, how is it that the child believes it did happen?
POZNER ON CROSS: Advanced Cross of Experts & Officers in DUI Cases
It’s not your strong opening argument. It’s not how many of your impassioned objections the judge sustains. It’s not even how you tie your theory of the case together with a dazzling closing statement bow. What wins your trial is your cross.
This is a sponsored ad
Generating Qualified Leads for NACDL Attorneys
NACDL Communications Department
The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers is the preeminent organization advancing the mission of the criminal defense bar to ensure justice and due process for persons accused of crime or wrongdoing. A professional bar association founded in 1958, NACDL's many thousands of direct members in 28 countries – and 90 state, provincial and local affiliate organizations totaling up to 40,000 attorneys – include private criminal defense lawyers, public defenders, military defense counsel, law professors and judges committed to preserving fairness and promoting a rational and humane criminal justice system.