NACDL encouraged by decision outlawing execution of mentally retarded
Washington, DC (June 20, 2002) -- The words with which the U.S. Supreme Court reversed itself, barring execution of the mentally retarded today, have the president of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers waiting for the logical extension of the ruling.
"Internationally, the ''consistency of the direction of the change'' has been there a long time," said Schwartz, referring to the words of Justice John Paul Stevens in the majority opinion, "but the United States is on the tail end of the movement. The willingness of the Supreme Court to reverse its judgment offers reason to be optimistic that its logic will lead to further restrictions on the death penalty, and eventually to its abolition."
Justice Stevens indicated that the steady stream of states outlawing execution of the mentally retarded influenced the majority as the Court reversed its earlier precedent and held that evolving standards now make such executions "cruel and unusual punishment" under the Eighth Amendment. "That same logic should move the Court toward barring all executions," said Schwartz, a criminal defense lawyer from Seattle.
"The death penalty will fall for three reasons," Schwartz predicted: "First, the system is too flawed to be fixed. More than 100 persons have been exonerated from death row since the death penalty was reinstated in the 1970s. We have so many flaws in the capital punishment system that we can't possibly truly believe that we don't execute innocent people.
"Second, we cannot afford the cost of executing people--not only in human terms, but financially. Studies indicate that the capital system costs $2 million to $3 million more per defendant that life without parole.
"Finally, we're out of step with all of the other Western nations, and continued capital punishment will interfere with our national security and law enforcement needs. France and Germany balked at providing evidence on Moussaoui for that reason. Canada, Mexico, and other nations have refused to extradite people to the U.S. unless they are assured that the defendants will not face the death penalty.
"In the courts, in state legislatures and in public forums, the death penalty is under ever greater challenge. It is only a matter of how soon it is eliminated, and we pledge to continue battling it to the end."
The case is Atkins v. Virginia, No. 00-8452.
A Defender’s Guide to Federal Evidence: A Trial Practice Handbook for Criminal Defense Attorneys
This Guide to Federal Evidence is the only federal evidence handbook written exclusively for criminal defense lawyers. The Guide analyzes each Federal Rule of Evidence and outlines the main evidentiary issues that confront criminal defense lawyers. It also summarizes countless defense favorable cases and provides tips on how to avoid common evidentiary pitfalls. The Guide contains multiple user-friendly flowcharts aimed at helping the criminal defense lawyer tackle evidence problems. A Defender’s Guide to Federal Evidence is an indispensable tool in preparing a case for trial.
Modern Digital Evidence & Technologies in Criminal Cases
Modern cases need modern defenses, and modern lawyers can't practice with an outdated playbook. This program is a contemporary training that identifies emerging technologies and digital evidence encountered in today's criminal cases and arms you with the tools necessary to combat expert witnesses, prosecutorial overreach, and an uneducated judge and jury. This comprehensive CLE program covers both general aspects of new technologies as well as practical courtroom application and legal challenges to the use of these new technologies.
Top Shelf DUI Defenses: The Law, The Science, The Techniques (2021)
If you are serious about being an effective DUI defense advocate, or if you’re considering adding DUI defenses to your portfolio, you need to know the latest scientific and legal strategies to optimize your success at trial. Learn from the best-of-the-best in the field in this unique CLE Program, updated for 2021.
Defending Modern Drug Cases (2021)
From challenging the arrest and seizure to picking a jury and cross-examining police officers, defense attorneys handling drug cases must be able to construct a defense that will increase the chances of the client getting a positive result for your client.
Effective motion practice, juror selection, and storytelling have never been more important. This seminar will introduce defense counsel to techniques that have been used at recent drug trials to rebut specific claims and overcome the emotion created in today’s criminal legal system.
NACDL Communications Department
The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers is the preeminent organization advancing the mission of the criminal defense bar to ensure justice and due process for persons accused of crime or wrongdoing. A professional bar association founded in 1958, NACDL's many thousands of direct members in 28 countries – and 90 state, provincial and local affiliate organizations totaling up to 40,000 attorneys – include private criminal defense lawyers, public defenders, military defense counsel, law professors and judges committed to preserving fairness and promoting a rational and humane criminal legal system.