Washington, DC (June 15, 1995) -- Racially discriminatory federal sentences for drug offenses involving crack cocaine will waste $3.5 billion of taxpayers' money if Congress fails to follow the recommendations of the U.S. Sentencing Commission to reduce those sentences, a report prepared for the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL) reveals.
The study, prepared by prominent criminal defense attorney John W. Coyle, III, of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, documents that some $3.5 billion can still be saved during the terms of already-sentenced inmates by reducing their sentences to what they would be if the sentences for crack had been equal to those for powder cocaine when they were sentenced.
Federal law currently imposes much harsher sentences -- as much as 100 times greater -- on persons convicted of possession of crack cocaine than it imposes on those convicted of possessing equivalent quantities of powder cocaine. Yet according to medical experts, there is no scientific evidence to support the suggestion that crack is more addictive or dangerous than powder cocaine. The Coyle report confirms that in 1994, while African-Americans accounted for 30.5 percent of persons sentenced for powder cocaine offenses, they comprised 90.5 percent of those sentenced under the harsher crack penalties. Just four percent of those sentenced for crack offenses were white. African-Americans make up 32 percent of all persons convicted of powder cocaine offenses since 1988 but 80.9 percent of those convicted of crack offenses, the report shows.
Based on its own February 1995 study, the Sentencing Commission recommended on May 1, 1995 that crack and powder cocaine sentences under the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines be equalized. The Commission also submitted legislation to equalize the statutory mandatory minimum sentences, which overlay the Guidelines and impose the same inequitable sentences. Congressman Charles Rangel (D-NY) has also introduced legislation to equalize the sentences (H.R.1264; the "Crack Cocaine Equitable Sentencing Act").
"The Sentencing Commission has done the just thing by recommending elimination of this racially discriminatory difference in sentences," NACDL President Gerald H. Goldstein, of San Antonio, Texas, commented. "The Coyle report shows that the Commission's recommendation makes financial sense for the country, too." NACDL and its members have been at the forefront of challenging the racially discriminatory impact of the crack sentences in court. Several federal judges have refused to impose the harsher crack sentences, including some who have found them unconstitutional.
Coyle, 47, a partner in Coyle & McCoy, has been practicing law in Oklahoma City since 1974, specializing in defending citizens accused of crime. He is now best known as one of two lawyers originally appointed to represent Oklahoma City bombing suspect Timothy McVeigh and later permitted to withdraw from that case because they lost friends in that tragic incident. A graduate of Oklahoma City University (B.A., 1971; J.D., 1974), Mr. Coyle defended accused child killer Jimmie Ray Slaughter in the longest murder trial in Oklahoma history. In March, 1995, he won an acquittal in State v. Dewey White, a case known in Oklahoma as the "Valentine's Day murders."
"I am not a specialist in drug cases," Mr. Coyle says, "but as a result of representing a defendant in a crack cocaine case in Oklahoma City, I became incensed at the unfairness of the enhanced penalties for crack."
A complete explanation of the crack cocaine sentencing disparity can be found in the NACDL Legislative Policy Paper, Crack Cocaine Sentencing Disparity, which precedes Mr. Coyle's attached report.
A Defender’s Guide to Federal Evidence: A Trial Practice Handbook for Criminal Defense Attorneys
This Guide to Federal Evidence is the only federal evidence handbook written exclusively for criminal defense lawyers. The Guide analyzes each Federal Rule of Evidence and outlines the main evidentiary issues that confront criminal defense lawyers. It also summarizes countless defense favorable cases and provides tips on how to avoid common evidentiary pitfalls. The Guide contains multiple user-friendly flowcharts aimed at helping the criminal defense lawyer tackle evidence problems. A Defender’s Guide to Federal Evidence is an indispensable tool in preparing a case for trial.
Modern Digital Evidence & Technologies in Criminal Cases
Modern cases need modern defenses, and modern lawyers can't practice with an outdated playbook. This program is a contemporary training that identifies emerging technologies and digital evidence encountered in today's criminal cases and arms you with the tools necessary to combat expert witnesses, prosecutorial overreach, and an uneducated judge and jury. This comprehensive CLE program covers both general aspects of new technologies as well as practical courtroom application and legal challenges to the use of these new technologies.
Top Shelf DUI Defenses: The Law, The Science, The Techniques (2021)
If you are serious about being an effective DUI defense advocate, or if you’re considering adding DUI defenses to your portfolio, you need to know the latest scientific and legal strategies to optimize your success at trial. Learn from the best-of-the-best in the field in this unique CLE Program, updated for 2021.
Defending Modern Drug Cases (2021)
From challenging the arrest and seizure to picking a jury and cross-examining police officers, defense attorneys handling drug cases must be able to construct a defense that will increase the chances of the client getting a positive result for your client.
Effective motion practice, juror selection, and storytelling have never been more important. This seminar will introduce defense counsel to techniques that have been used at recent drug trials to rebut specific claims and overcome the emotion created in today’s criminal legal system.
NACDL Communications Department
The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers is the preeminent organization advancing the mission of the criminal defense bar to ensure justice and due process for persons accused of crime or wrongdoing. A professional bar association founded in 1958, NACDL's many thousands of direct members in 28 countries – and 90 state, provincial and local affiliate organizations totaling up to 40,000 attorneys – include private criminal defense lawyers, public defenders, military defense counsel, law professors and judges committed to preserving fairness and promoting a rational and humane criminal legal system.