Constitutionality of Military Commission Trials in Doubt
Washington, DC (June 12, 2008) -- For the third time, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled against the Bush Administration’s arguments that federal courts have no jurisdiction over persons deemed “unlawful combatants” by U.S. military forces, at Guantanamo and overseas.
“As today’s decisions emphatically make clear, neither Congress nor the Executive Branch can create ‘law-free’ zones, at Guantanamo or anywhere else within the jurisdiction of the United States, where the federal courts cannot inquire into the legality of the detention,” said Carmen D. Hernandez, president of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL). “The federal judiciary can now examine the legality of the military detention and commission trial system in its entirety.”
Hernandez was praising the Court’s decisions in Boumediene v. Bush, in which Guantanamo detainees challenged the constitutionality of their detentions under the Detainee Treatment Act and the Military Commissions Act, and the unanimous decision Munaf v. Geren, which held that the habeas corpus clause extends to U.S. citizens held in detention by U.S. forces and coalition forces in Iraq.
“Separation of powers is central to our form of government,” Hernandez said. “It is the courts’ role to check the legality of acts of Congress and Executive actions affecting individual liberty and freedom. As James Madison put it over 200 years ago, the concentration of all powers in the same hands, whether of one or many, is ‘the very definition of tyranny.’
“Today’s decisions call the administration’s entire overseas detention program into question,” she said.
A friend-of-the-court brief filed by 17 prominent rights organizations, including NACDL, is posted on the association’s Web site at:
Pattern Cross-Examination of Expert Witnesses: A Trial Strategy & Resource Guide
In a criminal trial, cross-examination of the prosecution’s forensic expert may make the difference between victory or defeat.
2020 Sample Motions Collection Update
NACDL’s 2020 Sample Motions Collection is the follow-up to our wildly popular 2019 Sample Motions Collection and contains the newest and most recent additions to our ever-expanding Sample Motions library.
State v. Stone - A Case Study on Child Sexual Molestation & Sexual Battery
The criminal defense attorney tasked with defending such a case has to be prepared to not only show reasonable doubt, but to answer this question: If it did not happen, how is it that the child believes it did happen?
POZNER ON CROSS: Advanced Cross of Experts & Officers in DUI Cases
It’s not your strong opening argument. It’s not how many of your impassioned objections the judge sustains. It’s not even how you tie your theory of the case together with a dazzling closing statement bow. What wins your trial is your cross.
This is a sponsored ad
Generating Qualified Leads for NACDL Attorneys
NACDL Communications Department
The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers is the preeminent organization advancing the mission of the criminal defense bar to ensure justice and due process for persons accused of crime or wrongdoing. A professional bar association founded in 1958, NACDL's many thousands of direct members in 28 countries – and 90 state, provincial and local affiliate organizations totaling up to 40,000 attorneys – include private criminal defense lawyers, public defenders, military defense counsel, law professors and judges committed to preserving fairness and promoting a rational and humane criminal justice system.