Decision Further Isolates U.S. in Executing Citizens
Washington, DC (June 6, 1995) -- "This is a historic day, not just for South Africa, but for the entire world community," said an ecstatic National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL) President Gerald H. Goldstein, of San Antonio, Texas, in praising what he called the "wonderful, beautiful decision" of South Africa's Constitutional Court to outlaw capital punishment in that country. Goldstein noted that the decision further isolates the United States as the only Western country that still executes its citizens.
"The Constitutional Court has accepted what we know to be the case -- that whether a particular defendant receives the death penalty is too often determined by variables that have nothing to do with the defendant's criminal behavior," Goldstein added.
In its February 1990 report, "Death Penalty Sentencing: Research Indicates Pattern of Racial Disparities," the U.S. General Accounting Office concluded that available research "shows a pattern of evidence indicating racial disparities in the charging, sentencing, and imposition of the death penalty . . . ." in state courts. At the federal level, a March 1994 staff report by the House Subcommittee on Civil and Constitutional Rights concluded that "Racial minorities are being prosecuted under the federal death penalty law far beyond their proportion in the general population or in the population of criminal offenders."
"We're still looking the other way in this country, even after retired Supreme Court Justice Harry Blackmun publicly confessed last year that despite 20 years of legal tinkering, 'the death penalty remains fraught with arbitrariness, discrimination, caprice and mistake,'" said James E. Boren, of Baton Rouge, Louisiana, who co-chairs NACDL's Death Penalty Committee. "The injustices will only multiply as the federal government begins to apply the 50 new death penalties enacted by last year's crime bill and as states rush to execute more convicts in response to the perceived public hysteria about crime," Boren added.
"It's dispiriting that as other Western countries are outlawing the death penalty, the U.S. is expanding its use," Goldstein commented. "The South African Court, in its decision, accepted the simple wisdom expressed by Clarence Darrow almost three-quarters of a century ago: 'If the State wishes that its citizens respect human life,' Darrow said, 'then the State should stop killing.'"
"Legislators who justify the death penalty on grounds of 'sending a message' are blind to the real message of callousness and inequality that it sends to America's least-advantaged citizens -- from among whom virtually all of those actually executed come."
Even highly-respected Manhattan District Attorney Robert Morganthau announced earlier this year that "more than a century's experience has not produced credible evidence that executions deter crime. The only honest justification for the death penalty is vengeance," Morganthau wrote in a New York Times essay, "but the Lord says 'vengeance is mine.'"
"NACDL and its members will persevere in opposing the death penalty in Congress, in state legislatures, and in federal and state courts throughout the land as long as this inhumane practice remains a part of the American justice system," both Goldstein and Boren promised.
A Defender’s Guide to Federal Evidence: A Trial Practice Handbook for Criminal Defense Attorneys
This Guide to Federal Evidence is the only federal evidence handbook written exclusively for criminal defense lawyers. The Guide analyzes each Federal Rule of Evidence and outlines the main evidentiary issues that confront criminal defense lawyers. It also summarizes countless defense favorable cases and provides tips on how to avoid common evidentiary pitfalls. The Guide contains multiple user-friendly flowcharts aimed at helping the criminal defense lawyer tackle evidence problems. A Defender’s Guide to Federal Evidence is an indispensable tool in preparing a case for trial.
Modern Digital Evidence & Technologies in Criminal Cases
Modern cases need modern defenses, and modern lawyers can't practice with an outdated playbook. This program is a contemporary training that identifies emerging technologies and digital evidence encountered in today's criminal cases and arms you with the tools necessary to combat expert witnesses, prosecutorial overreach, and an uneducated judge and jury. This comprehensive CLE program covers both general aspects of new technologies as well as practical courtroom application and legal challenges to the use of these new technologies.
Top Shelf DUI Defenses: The Law, The Science, The Techniques (2021)
If you are serious about being an effective DUI defense advocate, or if you’re considering adding DUI defenses to your portfolio, you need to know the latest scientific and legal strategies to optimize your success at trial. Learn from the best-of-the-best in the field in this unique CLE Program, updated for 2021.
Defending Modern Drug Cases (2021)
From challenging the arrest and seizure to picking a jury and cross-examining police officers, defense attorneys handling drug cases must be able to construct a defense that will increase the chances of the client getting a positive result for your client.
Effective motion practice, juror selection, and storytelling have never been more important. This seminar will introduce defense counsel to techniques that have been used at recent drug trials to rebut specific claims and overcome the emotion created in today’s criminal legal system.
NACDL Communications Department
The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers is the preeminent organization advancing the mission of the criminal defense bar to ensure justice and due process for persons accused of crime or wrongdoing. A professional bar association founded in 1958, NACDL's many thousands of direct members in 28 countries – and 90 state, provincial and local affiliate organizations totaling up to 40,000 attorneys – include private criminal defense lawyers, public defenders, military defense counsel, law professors and judges committed to preserving fairness and promoting a rational and humane criminal legal system.