Amendments added at last minute, without conference discussion
Washington, DC (April 1, 2003) -- Criminal defense lawyers, judges, and civil rights groups want the U.S. Senate to knock out last-minute House amendments to the Amber Alert bill that would strip federal judges of the last remaining vestiges of discretion in sentencing federal offenders.
The amendments, which would potentially affect all federal defendants, are completely unrelated to the underlying Amber Alert legislation.
“The [Federal Sentencing] Guidelines are already a straightjacket for judges,” said Lawrence Goldman, president of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. "They have already severely limited judges’ ability to make individualized sentences."
The amendments to the House version of the bill pending in Congress would greatly hamper the ability of judges to depart downward from the recommended guideline sentence, unless the prosecution agreed. Departures for military service and extraordinary family responsibilities, for instance, would be prohibited.
Several civil rights groups signed on to an NACDL letter to House members opposing the provision the evening before the vote.
"These amendments leave the outcome of the case in the hands of one of the litigants, the prosecutor, rather than letting judges serve as judges," said Goldman, a criminal defense lawyer in New York City. “This House sneak attack should be rejected by the Senate. Any amendments to the Guidelines should first be considered by the independent Sentencing Guidelines Commission which Congress itself established. "
(For more information, visit www.nacdl.org/departures)
Continue reading below
Pattern Cross-Examination of Expert Witnesses: A Trial Strategy & Resource Guide
In a criminal trial, cross-examination of the prosecution’s forensic expert may make the difference between victory or defeat.
2020 Sample Motions Collection Update
NACDL’s 2020 Sample Motions Collection is the follow-up to our wildly popular 2019 Sample Motions Collection and contains the newest and most recent additions to our ever-expanding Sample Motions library.
State v. Stone - A Case Study on Child Sexual Molestation & Sexual Battery
The criminal defense attorney tasked with defending such a case has to be prepared to not only show reasonable doubt, but to answer this question: If it did not happen, how is it that the child believes it did happen?
POZNER ON CROSS: Advanced Cross of Experts & Officers in DUI Cases
It’s not your strong opening argument. It’s not how many of your impassioned objections the judge sustains. It’s not even how you tie your theory of the case together with a dazzling closing statement bow. What wins your trial is your cross.
This is a sponsored ad
Generating Qualified Leads for NACDL Attorneys
NACDL Communications Department
The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers is the preeminent organization advancing the mission of the criminal defense bar to ensure justice and due process for persons accused of crime or wrongdoing. A professional bar association founded in 1958, NACDL's many thousands of direct members in 28 countries – and 90 state, provincial and local affiliate organizations totaling up to 40,000 attorneys – include private criminal defense lawyers, public defenders, military defense counsel, law professors and judges committed to preserving fairness and promoting a rational and humane criminal justice system.