Washington, DC (Feb. 22, 2011) – The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL) and the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law today submitted an expedited request to the Department of Justice under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) seeking all “legal memoranda, procedures, policies, directives, guidelines, and other guidance[,]” since Dec. 25, 2009, “regarding use of the ‘public safety exception’ to Miranda v. Arizona in the course of terrorism or national security investigations.”
Miranda is the landmark Supreme Court case requiring law enforcement officials to read criminal suspects their rights, including their right to an attorney, before questioning them. A narrow "public safety" exception allows the government to skip this reading, but only in emergency situations. The Obama administration and some members of Congress hoped to enact legislation to make it easier to question terrorist suspects without reading them their rights. When these efforts proved controversial, the administration decided to take unilateral (and secret) action.
Attorney General Eric Holder first revealed the existence of a new Miranda policy in a statement to the New York Times reported on Dec. 30, 2010. A Justice Department spokesperson confirmed the Department has issued formal guidance on the use of the public safety exception in terrorism investigations — guidance that determines when terrorists will or will not be read the rights. As explained in the FOIA request, the requested records “directly relate to a highly public and controversial debate over the propriety of issuing Miranda warnings in terrorism investigations and the legitimate scope of the public safety exception.” Nonetheless, the Justice Department has refused to make the guidance public.
"The Justice Department's Miranda guidance amounts to secret law," said Elizabeth Goitein, Co-Director of the Brennan Center''s Liberty and National Security Program. "In matters of national security, the government may need to keep some operational details secret. But the public, Congress and the courts always have a right to know what law the government is applying. The secret Miranda guidance shuts the American people out of the debate on an issue that directly affects their safety and their rights."
“We remain very concerned that the federal government believes there could be a blanket terrorism exception to Miranda,” explained NACDL National Security Coordinator Michael Price, who filed the request on behalf of NACDL. “Miranda embodies a centuries-old tradition aimed at preventing coerced confessions that lead to wrongful incarceration and harm our national security. An effort to expand the public safety exception through formalized guidance to law enforcement risks turning the exception into the rule and creating an end run around the constitutional requirements of Miranda.”
The complete text of the FOIA Request is available on NACDL’s web site here.
Pattern Cross-Examination of Expert Witnesses: A Trial Strategy & Resource Guide
In a criminal trial, cross-examination of the prosecution’s forensic expert may make the difference between victory or defeat.
2020 Sample Motions Collection Update
NACDL’s 2020 Sample Motions Collection is the follow-up to our wildly popular 2019 Sample Motions Collection and contains the newest and most recent additions to our ever-expanding Sample Motions library.
State v. Stone - A Case Study on Child Sexual Molestation & Sexual Battery
The criminal defense attorney tasked with defending such a case has to be prepared to not only show reasonable doubt, but to answer this question: If it did not happen, how is it that the child believes it did happen?
POZNER ON CROSS: Advanced Cross of Experts & Officers in DUI Cases
It’s not your strong opening argument. It’s not how many of your impassioned objections the judge sustains. It’s not even how you tie your theory of the case together with a dazzling closing statement bow. What wins your trial is your cross.
This is a sponsored ad
Generating Qualified Leads for NACDL Attorneys
NACDL Communications Department
The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers is the preeminent organization advancing the mission of the criminal defense bar to ensure justice and due process for persons accused of crime or wrongdoing. A professional bar association founded in 1958, NACDL's many thousands of direct members in 28 countries – and 90 state, provincial and local affiliate organizations totaling up to 40,000 attorneys – include private criminal defense lawyers, public defenders, military defense counsel, law professors and judges committed to preserving fairness and promoting a rational and humane criminal justice system.