New Analysis Finds 54 Innocent Illinois Citizens Have Spent Total of 601 Years in Prison Because of Erroneous Eyewitness Convictions
Washington, DC (Februay 7, 2007) --
The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers will file a lawsuit tomorrow against the Chicago police and other Illinois police departments that participated in a controversial study of eyewitness and police lineups. The police refused to provide the underlying data and protocols supporting the report’s controversial conclusion that current eyewitness procedures—those that use traditional line ups where all suspects stand in a room together—are more effective than new procedures in which witnesses view one suspect at a time under the supervision of an officer who does not know who the suspect is in the line up.
The report astounded many people in the legal community because previous research has shown that these updated identification procedures can significantly reduce the rate of erroneous eyewitness identifications.
February 8, 2007, 10:00 am
Northwestern University School of Law
Rubloff Building, 8th Floor
750 N. Lake Shore Drive, Chicago
- Men who were wrongfully convicted because of erroneous eyewitness identification: Michael Evans, 27 years in prison because of false identification; Oscar Walden Jr., 13 years in prison because of false identification; Alejandro Dominguez, 12 years in prison because of false identification
- Martin S. Pinales, president, National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL), lawsuit plaintiff
- Rob Warden, executive director, Center on Wrongful Convictions, expert on causes of wrongful convictions
- Locke Bowman, legal director, MacArthur Justice Center, filing lawsuit on behalf of NACDL
In Illinois alone, 54 innocent people have spent a total of 601 years behind bars because of erroneous eyewitness convictions, according a new analysis by Center on Wrongful Convictions. In an effort to reduce false convictions, experts have found and tested new methods for eyewitness identification that have been proven to work. Because the Illinois report, released in 2006, finds that traditional lineups are more effective than these new methods and contradicts all previous research on eyewitness identification, many legal experts and professionals suspect the research is flawed.
As a result, MacArthur Justice Center, on behalf of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, requested the data on which the report’s findings were based but the request was refused or ignored by all police departments involved.
They will file a lawsuit tomorrow in state court seeking a court order directing the police departments involved—Chicago, Joliet, Evanston and Illinois—to turn over the underlying data from the taxpayer funded report.
Continue reading below
A Defender’s Guide to Federal Evidence: A Trial Practice Handbook for Criminal Defense Attorneys
This Guide to Federal Evidence is the only federal evidence handbook written exclusively for criminal defense lawyers. The Guide analyzes each Federal Rule of Evidence and outlines the main evidentiary issues that confront criminal defense lawyers. It also summarizes countless defense favorable cases and provides tips on how to avoid common evidentiary pitfalls. The Guide contains multiple user-friendly flowcharts aimed at helping the criminal defense lawyer tackle evidence problems. A Defender’s Guide to Federal Evidence is an indispensable tool in preparing a case for trial.
Modern Digital Evidence & Technologies in Criminal Cases
Modern cases need modern defenses, and modern lawyers can't practice with an outdated playbook. This program is a contemporary training that identifies emerging technologies and digital evidence encountered in today's criminal cases and arms you with the tools necessary to combat expert witnesses, prosecutorial overreach, and an uneducated judge and jury. This comprehensive CLE program covers both general aspects of new technologies as well as practical courtroom application and legal challenges to the use of these new technologies.
Top Shelf DUI Defenses: The Law, The Science, The Techniques (2021)
If you are serious about being an effective DUI defense advocate, or if you’re considering adding DUI defenses to your portfolio, you need to know the latest scientific and legal strategies to optimize your success at trial. Learn from the best-of-the-best in the field in this unique CLE Program, updated for 2021.
Defending Modern Drug Cases (2021)
From challenging the arrest and seizure to picking a jury and cross-examining police officers, defense attorneys handling drug cases must be able to construct a defense that will increase the chances of the client getting a positive result for your client.
Effective motion practice, juror selection, and storytelling have never been more important. This seminar will introduce defense counsel to techniques that have been used at recent drug trials to rebut specific claims and overcome the emotion created in today’s criminal legal system.
NACDL Communications Department
The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers is the preeminent organization advancing the mission of the criminal defense bar to ensure justice and due process for persons accused of crime or wrongdoing. A professional bar association founded in 1958, NACDL's many thousands of direct members in 28 countries – and 90 state, provincial and local affiliate organizations totaling up to 40,000 attorneys – include private criminal defense lawyers, public defenders, military defense counsel, law professors and judges committed to preserving fairness and promoting a rational and humane criminal legal system.