Washington, DC (February 7, 2003) --
Mobile lawyers challenge Ashcroft's halfway house order
By JOE DANBORN
A group of Mobile defense lawyers has sued the Federal Bureau of Prisons on behalf of clients whom federal authorities are sending to prison rather than the halfway houses recommended by judges in their cases.
The lawsuit -- and others like it around the country -- seeks an injunction against a recent decision by U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft to quit following recommendations from judges and other court officers for halfway house sentences.
Six weeks ago, an Ashcroft deputy sent a memo to the head of the U.S. Bureau of Prisons, telling her to stop using halfway houses altogether. The memo followed an opinion from the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel that berated the BOP for its long-standing practice of carrying out federal judges' requests regarding where convicts should serve their time.
"Community confinement does not constitute imprisonment for purposes of a sentencing order, and BOP lacks clear general statutory authority to place in community confinement an offender who has been sentenced to a term of imprisonment," the opinion declares.
A Justice Department spokesman said Thursday that officials there were unaware of the BOP's practice until recently, even though the practice itself dates back at least 37 years.
To qualify for sentencing to a halfway house, a convict must be a first-time, non-violent offender, a description that fits most white-collar criminals.
"There can't be two standards of law, one for one group of criminals and one for white-collar criminals," said Mark Corallo, the spokesman.
Dom Soto, one of the lawyers in the Mobile case, said he did not object to that logic.
Continue reading below
A Defender’s Guide to Federal Evidence: A Trial Practice Handbook for Criminal Defense Attorneys
This Guide to Federal Evidence is the only federal evidence handbook written exclusively for criminal defense lawyers. The Guide analyzes each Federal Rule of Evidence and outlines the main evidentiary issues that confront criminal defense lawyers. It also summarizes countless defense favorable cases and provides tips on how to avoid common evidentiary pitfalls. The Guide contains multiple user-friendly flowcharts aimed at helping the criminal defense lawyer tackle evidence problems. A Defender’s Guide to Federal Evidence is an indispensable tool in preparing a case for trial.
Modern Digital Evidence & Technologies in Criminal Cases
Modern cases need modern defenses, and modern lawyers can't practice with an outdated playbook. This program is a contemporary training that identifies emerging technologies and digital evidence encountered in today's criminal cases and arms you with the tools necessary to combat expert witnesses, prosecutorial overreach, and an uneducated judge and jury. This comprehensive CLE program covers both general aspects of new technologies as well as practical courtroom application and legal challenges to the use of these new technologies.
Top Shelf DUI Defenses: The Law, The Science, The Techniques (2021)
If you are serious about being an effective DUI defense advocate, or if you’re considering adding DUI defenses to your portfolio, you need to know the latest scientific and legal strategies to optimize your success at trial. Learn from the best-of-the-best in the field in this unique CLE Program, updated for 2021.
Defending Modern Drug Cases (2021)
From challenging the arrest and seizure to picking a jury and cross-examining police officers, defense attorneys handling drug cases must be able to construct a defense that will increase the chances of the client getting a positive result for your client.
Effective motion practice, juror selection, and storytelling have never been more important. This seminar will introduce defense counsel to techniques that have been used at recent drug trials to rebut specific claims and overcome the emotion created in today’s criminal legal system.
"If it's letting all those creeps from Enron get out of prison time because they have judge friends, well I agree, let's stop it," Soto said. "But it doesn't take into account people in situations like our clients are in."
All three convicts in the Mobile lawsuit were sentenced to terms of five months or less, with the judge in each case recommending that the time be served at the Community Corrections Center on the Mobile Bay Causeway. Now, however, the BOP has ordered them to report to penitentiaries.
As with most halfway house cases, the three Mobile convicts each convinced a judge and other court officers that society and the inmates would be better served by allowing them to continue to work.
April Mizell Estes, of Citronelle, pleaded guilty to bank fraud. She has a 4-year-old daughter, an infant son and a third child due in May. Chief U.S. District Judge Charles Butler Jr. sentenced her to five months at the halfway house and ordered her to repay $75,275, which she has been paying back ahead of schedule, according to the lawsuit.
Antonio Madden and his wife pleaded guilty to conspiring to pos sess Ecstasy with the intent to distribute. They faced up to 12 months of confinement. Hearing that Madden's wife was disabled and needed surgery and that Madden would have to support her, Senior U.S. District Judge Richard Vollmer Jr. sentenced her to home confinement and Madden to the halfway house.
Scotty Summers likewise pleaded guilty to conspiring to deal Ecstasy and got a five-month term from Vollmer, with the added recommendation that he be admitted to drug and mental health treatment programs at the halfway house. Instead, the BOP wants him to enter a Mississippi prison that offers no such programs, the lawsuit states.
All three are due to report to prison before the end of the month. Public defender Chris Knight, Estes' lawyer, said he would ask Butler to postpone that deadline until after the judge has heard arguments on the convicts' request for a restraining order.
A BOP spokeswoman said the new policy means 125 inmates face transfer from halfway houses to prison. She offered no guess as to how many inmates get halfway house sentences each year, but said officials had determined the additional inmates would place no strain on the federal prison system. For now, inmates may only enter a halfway house to serve out the final 10 percent of their sentences.
Late last month, a federal judge in Washington, D.C., blocked the BOP from sending a convict to prison, while a judge in Detroit ruled against a convict there. Cases are pending in Arkansas, Maryland, Massachusetts, New York, North Carolina, Tennessee, according to the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers.
Already, defense lawyers and judicial officers are looking for ways around the new policy. After the Justice Department decided that the change would affect only those half way house inmates with 150 days or more left to serve, Butler took one month off Estes' sentence, but the BOP still ordered her to report to prison in Tallahassee, Fla. Moreover, U.S. marshals in Mobile asked the BOP for an exception in Estes' case due to a clerical error on their part, but the BOP turned them down, Knight said.
On Wednesday, the same day the Mobile lawsuit was filed, Butler sentenced another of Knight's clients to five years of probation, but made it a condition of that probation that he serve five months of it in a halfway house. Whether that and similar maneuvers stand unchallenged remains to be seen, Knight said.
"It does somewhat complicate things because we've always relied on the court's authority to at least recommend halfway house confinement in less serious cases."
ON THE NET: www.nacdl.org
Copyright 2003 al.com. All Rights Reserved.
NACDL Communications Department
The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers is the preeminent organization advancing the mission of the criminal defense bar to ensure justice and due process for persons accused of crime or wrongdoing. A professional bar association founded in 1958, NACDL's many thousands of direct members in 28 countries – and 90 state, provincial and local affiliate organizations totaling up to 40,000 attorneys – include private criminal defense lawyers, public defenders, military defense counsel, law professors and judges committed to preserving fairness and promoting a rational and humane criminal legal system.