Washington, DC (January 14, 2009) – “It is a sad fact, ignored or overlooked by many, that most of the [Guantanamo] detainees will never be prosecuted for any crime,” John Wesley Hall, president of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, writes in this month’s issue of the association’s magazine. “We jailed those innocent people for their purported ‘information.’” Hall argues that the camps ought to be, and can be, emptied immediately and the prisoners sent home to their families “with our deepest apologies.”
“The time is long past for calling these persons ‘detainees.’ They’re prisoners, many of whom the government now admits have committed no crime, erroneously detained and imprisoned because no one had the guts to admit a mistake,” Hall said.
President-Elect Barack Obama has said he will close the camps at Guantanamo, but on ABC’s “This Week” Jan. 11 added, “it’s going to take some time.” Hall’s article, available on NACDL’s Web site, disputes the arguments that existing federal law and procedures are ill-equipped to handle Guantanamo cases. Most detainees could be repatriated to their own countries as quickly as travel arrangements could be made.
According to Hall, no special courts or military commissions are necessary. The federal court system has proven itself capable of dealing with those who are or can be charged with terrorism crimes against the United States or the Law of Nations. Persons accused of unlawful combat on the battlefield or war crimes should be tried in military courts with the protections of the Uniform Code of Military Justice and the Geneva Conventions.
Regarding those the present administration’s claim that some prisoners, although they have committed no crime, are too dangerous to release to their home countries, the article notes that the U.S. Supreme Court has upheld temporary confinement of individuals deemed dangerous – but only after a judge or jury, weighing competent evidence, has found that the person poses a clear and convincing danger to himself or others.
There is a special class of prisoner, however, that cannot be sent to their homelands in the foreseeable future because of the risk that they would be imprisoned, tortured or even executed for political or religious reasons. Hall argues that we must face the legal and moral consequences of imprisoning innocent persons and provide them with whatever assistance they need.
The full article can be viewed online or downloaded at: http://www.nacdl.org/public.nsf/mediasources/20090113a/$FILE/column.pdf.
Pattern Cross-Examination of Expert Witnesses: A Trial Strategy & Resource Guide
In a criminal trial, cross-examination of the prosecution’s forensic expert may make the difference between victory or defeat.
2020 Sample Motions Collection Update
NACDL’s 2020 Sample Motions Collection is the follow-up to our wildly popular 2019 Sample Motions Collection and contains the newest and most recent additions to our ever-expanding Sample Motions library.
State v. Stone - A Case Study on Child Sexual Molestation & Sexual Battery
The criminal defense attorney tasked with defending such a case has to be prepared to not only show reasonable doubt, but to answer this question: If it did not happen, how is it that the child believes it did happen?
POZNER ON CROSS: Advanced Cross of Experts & Officers in DUI Cases
It’s not your strong opening argument. It’s not how many of your impassioned objections the judge sustains. It’s not even how you tie your theory of the case together with a dazzling closing statement bow. What wins your trial is your cross.
This is a sponsored ad
Generating Qualified Leads for NACDL Attorneys
NACDL Communications Department
The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers is the preeminent organization advancing the mission of the criminal defense bar to ensure justice and due process for persons accused of crime or wrongdoing. A professional bar association founded in 1958, NACDL's many thousands of direct members in 28 countries – and 90 state, provincial and local affiliate organizations totaling up to 40,000 attorneys – include private criminal defense lawyers, public defenders, military defense counsel, law professors and judges committed to preserving fairness and promoting a rational and humane criminal justice system.