Letter of Support Sent to Congressional Leaders
Washington, DC (January 14, 2008) -- Two years ago, Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. took up his predecessor’s 20-year campaign for better pay for federal judges, calling the lack of adequate judicial compensation “a direct threat to judicial independence.”
In his 2007 year-end report, Roberts again made his case for restoring judicial pay “to the same level … that other federal employees have received since 1989.” The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL) concurred and passed a resolution of support. Federal judges’ paychecks have not kept up with the cost of living increases other federal employees receive. As a result, an experienced federal judge may earn less than first-year associates at major law firms. Presently, a U.S. district court trial judge earns $165,000 per year. Last summer, the large firms were starting lawyers just out of law school at $160,000 and starting salaries are expected to climb as high as $180,000 by summer.
Bills are now pending before the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives which would ameliorate the pay situation. Last month, H.R. 3753 was approved 28-5 by the House Judiciary Committee; the bill would raise the pay of district court judges to $218,000 and provide corresponding increases for federal appellate judges. A similar bill, S. 1638, is before the Senate Judiciary Committee. This week, NACDL’s Executive Committee approved a resolution affirming the Board’s position and supporting quick legislative action.
In a letter signed by President Carmen D. Hernandez, sent today to the leadership of the House and Senate, and chairs and ranking members of the judiciary committees, NACDL voiced strong support for both bills and took up Chief Justice Roberts’ call to pass the pay legislation “as a first order of business this session of Congress.”
“For evidence that the inadequacy of judicial pay undermines life tenure, one need only point to the unprecedented number of departures from the federal bench in recent years,” Hernandez wrote.
“As an association of lawyers who appear daily in our nation’s federal courts, we know first-hand the importance of a highly qualified and independent judiciary.”
Take Action - Tell your Senators and Representatives that you support fairness in judicial compensation.
Continue reading below
Pattern Cross-Examination of Expert Witnesses: A Trial Strategy & Resource Guide
In a criminal trial, cross-examination of the prosecution’s forensic expert may make the difference between victory or defeat.
2020 Sample Motions Collection Update
NACDL’s 2020 Sample Motions Collection is the follow-up to our wildly popular 2019 Sample Motions Collection and contains the newest and most recent additions to our ever-expanding Sample Motions library.
State v. Stone - A Case Study on Child Sexual Molestation & Sexual Battery
The criminal defense attorney tasked with defending such a case has to be prepared to not only show reasonable doubt, but to answer this question: If it did not happen, how is it that the child believes it did happen?
POZNER ON CROSS: Advanced Cross of Experts & Officers in DUI Cases
It’s not your strong opening argument. It’s not how many of your impassioned objections the judge sustains. It’s not even how you tie your theory of the case together with a dazzling closing statement bow. What wins your trial is your cross.
This is a sponsored ad
Generating Qualified Leads for NACDL Attorneys
NACDL Communications Department
The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers is the preeminent organization advancing the mission of the criminal defense bar to ensure justice and due process for persons accused of crime or wrongdoing. A professional bar association founded in 1958, NACDL's many thousands of direct members in 28 countries – and 90 state, provincial and local affiliate organizations totaling up to 40,000 attorneys – include private criminal defense lawyers, public defenders, military defense counsel, law professors and judges committed to preserving fairness and promoting a rational and humane criminal justice system.