☰ In this section

The Champion

July 2010 , Page 47 

Search the Champion Looking for something specific?

Preview of Member Only Content

For full access: login or Become a Member Join Now

The Lack of Statistics and Distortion Can Weaken Fingerprint Accuracy

By Michael Cherry; Edward J. Imwinkelried; Manfred Schenk

Fingerprint examiners claim that their subjective analyzes yield accurate conclusions as to the source of the images they study. However, that claim is suspect. Examiners rely on partial, distorted images. Moreover, they have yet to construct a convincing statistical case validating their approach. Consequently, forensic researchers throughout the world are proposing alternative methodologies for evaluating fingerprints. For example, some researchers are developing a fundamentally different, computerized approach to fingerprint comparisons. Rather than relying on subjective human interpretation, this approach carefully scans and measures the features in the images being compared. When the computer finds differences, the computer produces exhibits that clearly visualize the differences – differences showing either that the prints came from different people or that they are too deformed to be of evidentiary value. In the authors' experience, most crime scene

Want to read more?

The Champion archive is reserved for NACDL members.

NACDL members, please login to read the rest of this article.

Not a member? Join now.
Join Now
Or click here to see an overview of NACDL Member benefits.

See what NACDL members say about us.

To read the current issue of The Champion in its entirety, click here.

  • Media inquiries: Contact NACDL's Director of Public Affairs & Communications Ivan J. Dominguez at 202-465-7662 or idominguez@nacdl.org
  • Academic Requests: Full articles of The Champion Magazine are available for academic and research purposes in the WestLaw and LexisNexis databases.
Advertisement Advertise with Us

In This Section

Advertisement Advertise with Us