☰ In this section

The Champion

November 2007 , Page 42 

Search the Champion Looking for something specific?

Preview of Member Only Content

For full access: login or Become a Member Join Now

Search & Seizure Commentary

By John Wesley Hall

A Stop of a Car Is a Stop of Everybody in It: Brendlin v. California

Until Brendlin v. California1 came along, everybody, and virtually every court, except a majority of the California Supreme Court, assumed that a traffic stop amounted to a stop of all the occupants of the vehicle, too. The Supreme Court, in 1979, even said so in dicta in Delaware v. Prouse. But, prior to Brendlin, the Supreme Court had never specifically addressed the question.

Brendlin’s facts: Brendlin involved a suspicionless stop of a vehicle with a temporary tag. Once the vehicle was stopped, the officer recognized the passenger as being “one of the Brendlin brothers,” but he could not remember which one. He knew that one brother had dropped out of parole supervision. He directed the passenger to identify himself, and Brendlin did, and then the officer determined by a call to dispatch that Brendlin had a PV warrant with a no bond provision. The officer approached the car, pulled his gun

Want to read more?

The Champion archive is reserved for NACDL members.

NACDL members, please login to read the rest of this article.

Not a member? Join now.
Join Now
Or click here to see an overview of NACDL Member benefits.

See what NACDL members say about us.

To read the current issue of The Champion in its entirety, click here.

  • Media inquiries: Contact NACDL's Director of Public Affairs & Communications Ivan J. Dominguez at 202-465-7662 or idominguez@nacdl.org
  • Academic Requests: Full articles of The Champion Magazine are available for academic and research purposes in the WestLaw and LexisNexis databases.
Advertisement Advertise with Us

In This Section

Advertisement Advertise with Us