United States v. Nicholas Panarella, Jr.

Panarella pled guilty to a one-count superseding information, which charged him as an accessory after the fact to honest services wire fraud based on a theory of undisclosed self-dealing.  Panarella exhausted his direct appellate rights and, in light of the Skilling decision, petitioned for a writ of error coram nobis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a), the All Writs Act, on this one count. On July 29, 2011, the Court granted Panarella's petition.

Exclusive Content

The page you selected is for NACDL members. NACDL Members please log in to access you benefits.

Login

Members of NACDL receive access to exclusive content on the website along with many other benefits.