United States v. Trenkler

Brief of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers as Amicus Curiae in Support of Appellee.

United States v. Trenkler

Case Details
Key Topics in the Case

Documents

Prior Decision

D. Mass. No. 92-cr-10369

NACDL’s amicus brief argues that sentencing errors can be an extraordinary and compelling reason for a reduction in sentence. Sentencing errors fit within the definition of “extraordinary” and “compelling.” The government’s argument conflicts with the First Circuit’s decision in United States v. Ruvalcaba and similar cases from other circuits. A motion for compassionate release is fundamentally different than a second habeas petition.

Author(s)

Jamesa J. Drake, NACDL Amicus Committee 1st Circuit Vice-Chair, Auburn, ME; Michael L. Waldman and Courtney L. Millian, Kramer Levin Robbins Russell, Washington, DC.

Explore keywords to find information

Featured Products