United States v. Trenkler
Case Details
- Case No.: 21-1444
- Jurisdiction: 1st Circuit Court of Appeals
Key Topics in the Case
Documents
Prior Decision
D. Mass. No. 92-cr-10369
NACDL’s amicus brief argues that sentencing errors can be an extraordinary and compelling reason for a reduction in sentence. Sentencing errors fit within the definition of “extraordinary” and “compelling.” The government’s argument conflicts with the First Circuit’s decision in United States v. Ruvalcaba and similar cases from other circuits. A motion for compassionate release is fundamentally different than a second habeas petition.
Author(s)
Jamesa J. Drake, NACDL Amicus Committee 1st Circuit Vice-Chair, Auburn, ME; Michael L. Waldman and Courtney L. Millian, Kramer Levin Robbins Russell, Washington, DC.
