United States v. Trenkler
Brief Details
- Case No.: 21-1444
- Brief Filed: May 16, 2022
- Jurisdiction: 1st Circuit Court of Appeals
Key Topics in the Brief
Briefs
Prior Decision
D. Mass. No. 92-cr-10369
Argument(s)
NACDL’s amicus brief argues that sentencing errors can be an extraordinary and compelling reason for a reduction in sentence. Sentencing errors fit within the definition of “extraordinary” and “compelling.” The government’s argument conflicts with the First Circuit’s decision in United States v. Ruvalcaba and similar cases from other circuits. A motion for compassionate release is fundamentally different than a second habeas petition.
Author(s)
Jamesa J. Drake, NACDL Amicus Committee 1st Circuit Vice-Chair, Auburn, ME; Michael L. Waldman and Courtney L. Millian, Kramer Levin Robbins Russell, Washington, DC.
