United States v. Sittenfeld
Case Details
- Case No.: 1:20-cr-00142
- Case Filed: November 18, 2020
- Jurisdiction: S.D. Ohio
- Charges: 18 U.S.C. 1343, 18 U.S.C. 666, 18 U.S.C. 1951
- Case Outcome: Dismissal with Prejudice, Guilty - Jury
- Judge: Cole, Douglas R.
- Defendant(s): Sittenfeld, Alexander
- Defense Attorney: Francisco, Noel (Jones Day)
Case Analysis
Login is required to view the "Case Analysis" section of the Case Tracker. This content is limited to defense practitioners. Please log in or create a free NACDL account to continue. Non-NACDL members will be prompted to complete a brief attorney attestation form before access is granted.
Case Files
-
ECF: 3 - 11/18/20 - Government - Indictment - Indictment
Indictment -
ECF: 25 - 12/23/20 - Defense - Motion to Dismiss - Defendant's Amended Motion to Dismiss the Indictment
Defendant's Amended Motion to Dismiss the Indictment -
ECF: 28 - 01/25/21 - Government - Motions - Opposition to MTD
Opposition to MTD -
ECF: 46 - 02/08/21 - Defense - Motions - Response to opposition to MTD
Response to opposition to MTD -
ECF: 53 - 03/01/21 - Court - Order on Motion to Dismiss Indictment - Denying MTD
Denying MTD -
ECF: 207 - 07/08/22 - Court - Order - Jury Verdict
Jury Verdict -
ECF: 209 - 07/12/22 - Defense - Motions for/against Discovery - Motion for disclosure of jury questionnaires
Motion for disclosure of jury questionnaires -
ECF: 222 - 07/22/22 - Defense - Motions for/against Discovery - Motion to conduct forensic exam of juror's cell phone
Motion to conduct forensic exam of juror's cell phone -
ECF: 234 - 08/03/22 - Court - Order - Denying forensic examination of juror cellphone, granting in part motion to communicate with jurors
Denying forensic examination of juror cellphone, granting in part motion to communicate with jurors -
ECF: 258 - 09/23/22 - Court - Order - 6th Cir. affirming denial of motion for forensic exam of juror's cellphone
6th Cir. affirming denial of motion for forensic exam of juror's cellphone -
ECF: 270 - 09/30/22 - Defense - Motions for Judgment of Acquittal - Motions for Judgment of Acquittal
Motions for Judgment of Acquittal -
ECF: 271 - 09/30/22 - Defense - Motions - Motion for new trial
Motion for new trial -
ECF: 276 - 10/21/22 - Government - Motions - Opposition to motion for acquittal
Opposition to motion for acquittal -
ECF: 277 - 10/21/22 - Government - Motions - Opposition to motion for new trial
Opposition to motion for new trial -
ECF: 278 - 11/04/22 - Defense - Motions - Response to opposition to motion for acquittal
Response to opposition to motion for acquittal -
ECF: 279 - 11/04/22 - Defense - Motions - Response to opposition to motion for new trial
Response to opposition to motion for new trial -
ECF: 283 - 04/17/23 - Court - Order - Denying motions for acquittal and new trial
Denying motions for acquittal and new trial -
ECF: 307 - 11/08/23 - Court - Sentencing - Amended judgment
Amended judgment -
ECF: 314 - 02/11/25 - Court - Order - 6th Cir. affirming conviction
6th Cir. affirming conviction -
ECF: 316 - 06/11/25 - Other - Other - Presidential grant of clemency
Presidential grant of clemency -
ECF: 318 - 11/10/25 - Government - Motion to Dismiss - Motion to dismiss with prejudice
Motion to dismiss with prejudice -
ECF: 323 - 05/08/26 - Court - Order - Supreme Court vacating 6th Cir. and remanding for dismissal
Supreme Court vacating 6th Cir. and remanding for dismissal -
ECF: 327 - 08/05/26 - Defense - Miscellaneous - Defendant's Response to the Government's motion to dismiss
Defendant's Response to the Government's motion to dismiss -
ECF: 328 - 08/24/26 - Court - Order on Motion to Dismiss Indictment - Dismissing indictment with prejudice
Dismissing indictment with prejudice
Case Appeals
Final - Date Filed 10/17/23 - 6th Circuit Court of Appeals
See the Analysis section for appeal analysis.
Appeal Details
- Case Number: 23-3840
- Date Filed: 10/17/2023
- Jurisdiction: 6th Circuit Court of Appeals
- Type: Final
- Status: Decided
Panel: Bush, John K.; Murphy, Eric E.; Nalbandian, John
Questions Presented
When the government alleges bribery based solely on lawful campaign contributions, may the defendant be convicted based on evidence that is ambiguous as to whether the public official conditioned any official act on the campaign contributions?
Result on Appeal
The conviction was affirmed in February 2025, but before the mandate issued and the conviction became final, President Trump granted a full pardon to the defendant. Thereafter, the defendant filed a petition for certiorari challenging his conviction, and in response the government, which had simultaneously filed a motion to dismiss with prejudice in the district court, responded to the cert petition with a request that the Supreme Court vacate the conviction and remand for consideration of the motion to dismiss. On May 6, 2026, the Supreme Court granted cert. and vacated the conviction, remanding to the Sixth Circuit.
Appeal Files
-
02/29/24 - ECF: 58 - Brief - Appellant's reply brief
Appellant's reply brief -
12/11/23 - ECF: 22 - Brief - Appellant brief
Appellant brief -
12/19/23 - ECF: 39 - Brief - Amicus brief of former federal, state, and local elected officials in support of appellant
Amicus brief of former federal, state, and local elected officials in support of appellant -
12/18/23 - ECF: 29 - Brief - Amicus brief of Free Speech Institute in support of appellant
Amicus brief of Free Speech Institute in support of appellant -
02/09/24 - ECF: 55 - Brief - Appellee brief
Appellee brief -
12/18/23 - ECF: 33 - Brief - Amicus brief of former federal officials in support of appellant
Amicus brief of former federal officials in support of appellant -
12/18/23 - ECF: 31 - Brief - Amicus brief of business and civic leaders in support of appellant
Amicus brief of business and civic leaders in support of appellant -
12/18/23 - ECF: 35 - Brief - Amicus brief by former public corruption prosecutors in support of appellant
Amicus brief by former public corruption prosecutors in support of appellant -
12/18/23 - ECF: 27 - Brief - Amicus brief of law professors in support of appellant
Amicus brief of law professors in support of appellant -
07/02/26 - ECF: 85 - Order - Order vacating conviction
Order vacating conviction -
02/11/25 - ECF: 73 - Opinion - Affirming conviction
Affirming conviction
Suggest a Case
Know of a federal case that departs from traditional enforcement norms? Let us know.
Suggest a CaseResources
Case Tracker Feedback
Help us improve the Unusual Case Tracker by sharing your experience and suggestions.
Take Brief Survey