United States v. Rubashkin

Amicus curiae brief of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers and Eight Law Professors in support of appellant.

Brief filed: 01/13/2011

Documents

United States v. Rubashkin

8th Circuit Court of Appeals; Case No. 10-2487 & 10-3580

Argument(s)

Per Morrison v. Olson(1988), a judge should not preside over a trial in which she was intimately involved with the prosecution in the events leading up to trial and should have disqualified herself from hearing defendant-appellant’s new trial motion when her pretrial participation in the prosecution belatedly came to light after defendant’s trial.

Featured Products

Author(s)

Prof. Ronald D. Rotunda, Chapman University School of Law, Orange, CA.