United States v. Newman and Chiasson

Brief of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers as Amicus Curiae in support of Appellants.

Brief filed: 08/22/2013

Documents

United States v. Newman and Chiasson

2nd Circuit Court of Appeals; Case No. 13-1837

Argument(s)

The District Court’s jury instructions conflict with the fundamental principle that a defendant must know the facts that make his conduct illegal. Basic principles of mens rea require proof that the defendant knew the facts that made his conduct unlawful. The federal securities laws require proof that a tippee knew the original tipper of inside information disclosed information in exchange for a personal benefit. The requirement of proof of knowledge that the original tipper disclosed information in exchange for a personal benefit is particularly important in cases involving remote tippees.

Coronavirus Resources

NACDL to Focus on Service and Support for Members, Clients, and Community Throughout Virus Emergency

Learn More

Author(s)

Ira M. Feinberg, Jordan L. Estes, Hagan Scotten, Hogan Lovells US LLP, New York, NY; Joshua L. Dratel, New York, NY.