United States v. Brown

NACDL amicus curiae brief arguing that the appellants were prosecuted under novel theories that expanded the wire fraud statute, i.e., that the appellants engaged in a scheme to deprive Enron of a “property right” to receive a full and fair report of the corporation’s “full and accurate economic information” and deprived the company of an intangible right of honest services of its employees.

Brief filed: 08/04/2005

Documents

United States v. Brown

5th Circuit Court of Appeals; Case No. 05-20319

Argument(s)

Brief argues that the wire fraud statute (18 U.S.C. §1343) neither creates nor protects a “property right” to “accurate financial information”; that the phrase “scheme to defraud” as used in the statute is limited to schemes in which the defendant obtains money or property; and last, that the jury instructions erroneously extended liability for deprivation of honest services to defendants who worked openly with company employees to the company’s and shareholders’ benefit.

Coronavirus Resources

NACDL to Focus on Service and Support for Members, Clients, and Community Throughout Virus Emergency

Learn More

Author(s)

James E. Boren, Baton Rouge, La.