Oregon v. Ice

Amicus curiae brief of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers in support of Respondent.

Brief filed: 08/08/2008


Oregon v. Ice

United States Supreme Court; Case No. 07-901

Prior Decision

Case below 170 P3d 1049 (Or. 2007)


Oregon’s consecutive sentence statute, which allows a judge to impose consecutive sentences upon finding certain facts, violates the Sixth Amendment and the Court’s decisions in Apprendi v. New Jersey (2000) and Blakely v. Washington (2004).

Featured Products


Jeffrey T. Green, James C. Owens and Madeleine V. Findley, Sidley Austin LLP, Washington, DC.