Henderson v. United States

Brief for the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers as Amicus Curiae in Support of Petitioner.

Brief filed: 12/15/2014

Documents

Henderson v. United States

United States Supreme Court; Case No. 13-148

Prior Decision

Decision below 555 Fed.Appx. 851, C.A.11 (Fla.), January 28, 2014 (NO. 12-14628).

Argument(s)

The due process clause and 18 U.S. C. § 924(d) require that a firearm be subject to forfeiture to extinguish ownership. The statutory history of § 922(g) does not suggest any intent to allow deprivation of ownership interest without any process. Section 924(d) explicitly distinguishes between an "owner," a "possessor" and a "delegate." Ability to transfer possession to a third party is consistent with the fact that a disability may be temporary. Like forfeiture, permanent retention of firearms may be an excessive fine under the Eighth Amendment.

Coronavirus Resources

NACDL to Focus on Service and Support for Members, Clients, and Community Throughout Virus Emergency

Learn More

Author(s)

Stephen P. Halbrook, Fairfax, VA; Jonathan D. Hacker, Washington, DC.