Gonzalez v. Crosby

NACDL amicus curiae brief. Whether the Anti-terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA)'s habeas restrictions on second or successive petitions preclude the use of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) to reopen a final judgment. Successive habeas petitions and Rule 60(b) motions are distinct applications to the court, which serve different purposes, raise different issues, seek different relief, and thus do not overlap.

Gonzalez v. Crosby

  • Case No.: 04-6432
  • Jurisdiction: United States Supreme Court
  • Brief Filed: February 25, 2005

Briefs

Argument(s)

 

Featured Products

Author(s)

Prof. M Aya Gruber, et al., Florida International University College of Law.

Explore keywords to find information