Giles v. California

Amicus curiae brief of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers in support of petitioner.

Giles v. California

Documents

Prior Decision

Opinion below, 152 P.3d 433 (Cal. 2007)

Question Presented

Whether a defendant forfeits his Sixth Amendment right to confrontation if the defendant kills the witness, even if the defendant did not cause the witness’s unavailability for the purpose of preventing the witness from testifying. The defendant admitted killing his girlfriend but claimed he acted in self-defense, testifying that she was a violent person who had shot another man and had threatened people with knives. To prove that the killing was premeditated, the state introduced statements the decedent has made to police officers weeks earlier accusing the defendant of threatening and assaulting her on another occasion; the court admitted the statements under a statutory hearsay exception for certain “trustworthy” statements of unavailable witnesses.

 

Featured Products

Author(s)

Jeffrey A. Lamken and Robert K. Kry, Baker Botts LLP, Washington, DC and Kennon L. Peterson, Baker Botts LLP, San Antonio, TX.

Explore keywords to find information