Gall v. United States & Kimbrough v.United States

Amicus curiae brief of the National Association of Criminal Defense lawyers.

Brief filed: 07/26/2007

Documents

Gall v. United States & Kimbrough v.United States

United States Supreme Court; Case No. 06-7949 etc.

Argument(s)

In support of (1) It is not consistent with United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), and Rita v. United States, 551 U.S. __ (2007), for an appellate court to require that a sentence which lies outside the Guidelines range be justified by “extraordinary circumstances,” and (2) Sentencing judges must consider whether the Guideline ranges applicable to a given category of offenses adequately represent a sound balancing of all the Section 3553 factors pertinent to selecting the sentence for a particular case or group of cases within that category.

Coronavirus Resources

NACDL to Focus on Service and Support for Members, Clients, and Community Throughout Virus Emergency

Learn More

Author(s)

Miguel A. Estrada and David Debold, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Washington, DC.