Davis v. Washington

Amicus curiae brief of the NACDL, the Washington Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, and the Public Defender Service for the District of Columbia.

Davis v. Washington

  • Case No.: 05-5224
  • Jurisdiction: United States Supreme Court
  • Brief Filed: December 22, 2005

Briefs

Argument(s)

Alleged victim's “excited” statements to a 911 operator naming her assailant constituted "testimonial" statements subject to the Confrontation Clause restrictions enunciated in Crawford v. Washington,541 U.S. 36 (2004); amici urge the Court to adopt a “bright line” rule requiring confrontation at trial for all accusatory statements made to 911 operators, who act as agents of the police when interviewing callers. See also Hammon v. Indiana, No. 05-5705 (“excited utterance” to responding officer).

Featured Products

Author(s)

Timothy P. O'Toole, et al. 

Explore keywords to find information