Robert J. Anello and Miriam L. Glaser, White Collar Crime , 85 Fordham L. Rev. 39 (October 2016)
Frank E. Rudewicz, Ricardo Zayas, and Nitasha J. Giardina, Calculation of Loss and Required Sentences in White-Collar Crimes: Are You Considering All Factors? , Business Law Today (June 2016)
Jillian Hewitt, Fifty Shades of Gray: Sentencing Trends in Major White-Collar Cases , 125 Yale L.J. 1018 (February 2016)
Bruce Moyer, Criminal Sentencing Proposals Emerge in Congress , 62 DEC Fed. Law. 6 (December 2015)
Alan Ellis, Advice from the Bench for the White-Collar Client Facing Sentencing , 30 Fall Crim. Just. 58 (Fall 2015)
Christopher Slobogin, Plea Bargaining and the Substantive and Procedural Goals of Criminal Justice: From Retribution and Adversarialism to Preventive Justice and Hybrid-Inquisitorialism (March 2015)
“US Sentencing Commission proposes (modest but significant) changes to the fraud guidelines ,” Sentencing Law and Policy, January 9, 2015. [USSC proposed amendments ]
"Nonsensical Sentences for White Collar Criminals ," Newsweek , June 26, 2014
Lucian E. Dervan, The Quest for Finality: Five Stories of White Collar Criminal Prosecution , 4 Wake Forest J.L. & Pol'y 91 (2014)
The Federal Prison Population Buildup: Overview, Policy Changes, Issues, and Options , Congressional Research Service , April 15, 2014
Lucian E. Dervan, White Collar Over-Criminalization: Deterrence, Plea Bargaining, and the Loss of Innocence , 101 Ky. L.J. 723 (2013)
Amy Baron Evans and Kate Stith, Booker Rules , 160 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1631 (2012)
Continue reading below
Featured Products
Challenging Carceral Forensic Software
This program arms defense attorneys with the legal strategies and technical understanding needed to challenge software evidence at every stage: expert qualifications, reliability under Rule 702, confrontation rights, discovery, due process, and more. You'll learn how to cross-examine government witnesses who rely on black-box technology they don’t truly understand—and how to force the court to take a closer look at what's really driving forensic conclusions. Learn how STRmix, TruleIO, ShotSpotter, and AI-generated sketches are marketed as scientifically validated, yet often evade scrutiny.
Pattern Cross-Examination for Digital Forensic Experts
This guide provides ready-to-use cross-examination questions, categorized by artifact type and case theme—from cell phone towers to deleted texts to smart devices and cloud forensics. Whether you’re handling a case involving child exploitation, stalking, or online fraud, this book delivers practical patterns designed to highlight sloppy forensics, bias, tool limitations, and assumptions of intent or identity. Defense attorneys don’t need a computer science degree—they need strategy, control, and the right questions to challenge the illusion of digital certainty in court.
Using Chat GPT in Criminal Cases - Writing Better Prompts
Want a motion written in plain language but grounded in Tennessee case law? Need a summary of Fourth Amendment jurisprudence with primary and secondary citations? This is where you learn how to get that—on demand, and with far less editing. This training is designed specifically for attorneys—busy professionals who need fast, accurate, and case-relevant AI support. Whether you’re drafting motions, brainstorming legal strategy, summarizing complex case law, or preparing cross-examinations, the quality of your AI output comes down to one thing: how you ask for it.
Alcohol, Blackouts and Consent in Sex Cases
This comprehensive training program provides defense attorneys with a rigorous, science-backed approach to dismantling prosecutorial narratives, exposing unreliable testimony, and ensuring that juries are properly educated on the complexities of memory, intoxication, and consent. You'll explores critical mistakes and misconceptions encountered in these cases, including errors in memory reconstruction after an event, incorrect inferences, cognitive schemas, suggestibility, contamination and misinformation, mistakes of fact and more.
Overcoming the Presumption of Guilt and Defining Reasonable Doubt
Reasonable Doubt, what is it?
In order to win criminal cases, the defense practitioner must object to a reasonable doubt standard that lowers the burden of guilt. This program will discuss proven methods to argue and define reasonable doubt persuasively to a jury. You’ll learn how define reasonable doubt using metaphors and hypothetical scenarios that force juries to dispute the evidence, conflicts in the evidence, or even lack of evidence in your case.
The DIY of DNA: Exoneration Through DNA Evidence
This presentation might be the first time you’re truly able to truly grasp the fundamentals of DNA evidence. This critical presentation blends real-world storytelling with clear, practical instruction—making DNA evidence finally feel accessible, even to non-scientists—while inspiring attorneys to dig deeper, ask smarter questions, and approach forensic science with newfound confidence. You’ll learn how to identify and interpret electropherograms, understand autosomal vs. Y-STR testing, and recognize the limits of DNA evidence—particularly when it involves partial or mixed samples.
"Out-of-control fraud guidelines ," The National Law Journal , July 25, 2011
Ellen C. Brotman, Make Probation a Real Option at Sentencing , Federal Sentencing Reporter (April 2011)
Judge William K. Sessions III, At the Crossroads of the Three Branches: The U.S. Sentencing Commission's Attempts to Achieve Sentencing Reform in the Midst of Inter-Branch Power Struggles (2011)
Alan Ellis, John R. Steer, and Mark H. Allenbaugh, At a "LOSS" for Justice - Federal Sentencing For Economic Offenses, Criminal Justice Magazine , vol. 25, no. 4 (Winter 2011)
Derick R. Vollrath, Losing The Loss Calculation: Toward A More Just Sentencing Regime In White-Collar Criminal Cases , 59 Duke L.J. 1001 (2010)
Paul N. Monnin & R. Joseph Burby, Off the Chart: The U.S.Sentencing Guidelines Become Increasingly Irrelevant in the Wake of the Market Meltdown , 4 White Collar Crime Rep. (BNA) No. 298 (April 24, 2009)
Ellen C. Brotman and Bryan M. Shay, “A Frontal Assault” on the White-Collar Sentencing Guidelines" (March 2009)
Robert G. Morvillo and Robert J. Anello, Calculating Loss under the Guidelines , New York Law Journal (Oct. 8, 2008)
Evan A. Jenness, Gaining the Upper Hand in Arguing Loss in Securities Fraud Cases , The Champion Magazine , September 2008
John H. Chun and Gregory M. Gilchrist, Challenges for White Collar Sentencing in the Post-Booker Era , The Champion Magazine , May/June 2008
Ellen S. Podgor, The Challenge of White Collar Sentencing , 97 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 3 (2007)
Frank O. Bowman, III, Drifting Down the Dnieper with Prince Potemkin: Some Skeptical Reflections About the Place of Compliance Programs in Federal Criminal Sentencing , 39 Wake Forest L. Rev. 671 (2004)