In July 2009, after a six-week jury trial in the Southern District of New York, Frederic Bourke Jr., co-founder of Dooney & Bourke, was found guilty of making false statements and violating FCPA. Prosecutors alleged that Bourke knew of a plot by Viktor Kozeny to bribe Azerbaijani officials to let Kozeny's investment group buy a stake in the state’s oil company in the late 1990s. Bourke was sentenced by U.S. District Court Judge Shira Scheindlin to a year and a day in prison. Judge Scheindlin explained her sentence by stating: “After years of supervising this case, it’s still not entirely clear to me whether Mr. Bourke is a victim or a crook or a little bit of both.” On appeal, defense attorneys for Bourke argued that the prosecutors used perjured testimony in order to obtain a conviction. After several unsuccessful appeals to the Second Circuit, Bourke began his sentence in May 2013. Viktor Kozeny, the apparent orchestrator of the scheme, has avoided extradition to the United States by remaining in the Bahamas.
News
"Bourke's last stand? ," The FCPA Blog , May 10, 2013.
"Supreme Court denies Bourke review ," The FCPA Blog , April 16, 2013.
"Bourke Alleges False Testimony In New Appeal ," The Wall Street Journal , April 12, 2012.
"Bourke Loses Bid For New FCPA Trial In Second Legal Setback ," Bloomberg , December, 15, 2011.
"Judges Appear Unmoved by Bourke's Arguments on Appeal ," Global Investigations Review , February 15, 2011.
"Jury Finds Frederic Bourke Guilty of Bribery-Related Charges ," The Wall Street Journal Law Blog , July 10, 2009.
Defense Filings
Brief on Appeal , United States v. Kozeny et al. , No. 05 Cr. 518 (S.D.N.Y. April 1, 2010)
Reply Memo in Support of Motion for New Trial Based on Newly Discovered Evidence , United States v. Kozeny et al. , No. 05 Cr. 518 (S.D.N.Y. June 17, 2011)
Motion for New Trial Based on Newly Discovered Evidence , United States v. Kozeny et al. , No. 05 Cr. 518 (S.D.N.Y. March 9, 2011)
Government Filings
Brief on Appeal , United States v. Kozeny et al. , No. 05 Cr. 518 (2nd Cir. July 29, 2010)
Opposition to Defendant's Requests for Certain Jury Instructions Related to His Possible Affirmative Defenses , United States v. Kozeny et al. , No. 05 Cr. 518 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 12, 2008)
Continue reading below
Featured Products
Alcohol, Blackouts and Consent in Sex Cases
This comprehensive training program provides defense attorneys with a rigorous, science-backed approach to dismantling prosecutorial narratives, exposing unreliable testimony, and ensuring that juries are properly educated on the complexities of memory, intoxication, and consent. You'll explores critical mistakes and misconceptions encountered in these cases, including errors in memory reconstruction after an event, incorrect inferences, cognitive schemas, suggestibility, contamination and misinformation, mistakes of fact and more.
Overcoming the Presumption of Guilt and Defining Reasonable Doubt
Reasonable Doubt, what is it?
In order to win criminal cases, the defense practitioner must object to a reasonable doubt standard that lowers the burden of guilt. This program will discuss proven methods to argue and define reasonable doubt persuasively to a jury. You’ll learn how define reasonable doubt using metaphors and hypothetical scenarios that force juries to dispute the evidence, conflicts in the evidence, or even lack of evidence in your case.
The DIY of DNA: Exoneration Through DNA Evidence
This presentation might be the first time you’re truly able to truly grasp the fundamentals of DNA evidence. This critical presentation blends real-world storytelling with clear, practical instruction—making DNA evidence finally feel accessible, even to non-scientists—while inspiring attorneys to dig deeper, ask smarter questions, and approach forensic science with newfound confidence. You’ll learn how to identify and interpret electropherograms, understand autosomal vs. Y-STR testing, and recognize the limits of DNA evidence—particularly when it involves partial or mixed samples.
AI Rising: Integrating & Fighting the Use of Artificial Intelligence
This unique online training will discuss hot topics in AI, including how you might integrate these tools into your practice, use them ethically, and, how you might attack law enforcement’s use of AI tools to ensnare your clients. You'll also uncover e-discovery and combing through terabytes of data all the way to using ChatGPT to test cross-examination questions. These tools can generate content and reach conclusions.
A Defender's Guide to Federal Evidence - 2nd Edition
This brand-new 2nd Edition 2024 Guide to Federal Evidence is the only federal evidence handbook written exclusively for criminal defense lawyers. The updated 2024 Guide analyzes each Federal Rule of Evidence and outlines the main evidentiary issues that confront criminal defense lawyers. It also summarizes countless defense favorable cases and provides tips on how to avoid common evidentiary pitfalls. The 2nd Edition Guide contains multiple new and updated user-friendly flowcharts aimed at helping the criminal defense lawyer tackle evidence problems.
Court Orders
Order Denying Post-Trial Motions , United States v. Kozeny et al. , No. 05 Cr. 518 (S.D.N.Y. December 13, 2009)
Jury Charge , United States v. Kozeny et al. , No. 05 Cr. 518 (S.D.N.Y. 2008)
Indictment , United States v. Kozeny et al. , No. 05 Cr. 518 (S.D.N.Y. May 12, 2005)