☰ In this section

The Champion

May 2018 , Page 50 

Search the Champion Looking for something specific?

Preview of Member Only Content

For full access: login or Become a Member Join Now

When DNA Is Not a Gold Standard: Failing to Interpret Mixture Evidence

By Mark W. Perlin, Ph.D., M.D., Ph.D.

Forensic science connects evidence through shared characteristics. Markings on a bullet can appear to match grooves in the barrel of a gun. Latent fingerprints left at a crime scene may be similar to ridge patterns on a suspect’s hand. Tracks in the mud may mirror the treads of a shoe or tire. Police gather forensic evidence to help build a case, and police dramas on television convey the myth of forensic infallibility through the “CSI” effect.1 

In 2009, the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) published its seminal report titled Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States.2 The NAS report reviewed many forensic modalities and questioned their scientific validity. The interpretation of forensic data is often unreliable. Match statistics are needed to gauge the strength of match between items, relative to coincidence. But forensic statistics are typically absent or incorrect. Human bias can skew answers by unconsciously selecting favorable data, using knowledge about defendant cha

Want to read more?

The Champion archive is reserved for NACDL members.

NACDL members, please login to read the rest of this article.

Not a member? Join now.
Join Now
Or click here to see an overview of NACDL Member benefits.

See what NACDL members say about us.

To read the current issue of The Champion in its entirety, click here.

  • Media inquiries: Contact NACDL's Director of Public Affairs & Communications Ivan J. Dominguez at 202-465-7662 or idominguez@nacdl.org
  • Academic Requests: Full articles of The Champion Magazine are available for academic and research purposes in the WestLaw and LexisNexis databases.
Advertisement Advertise with Us

In This Section

Advertisement Advertise with Us