☰ In this section

The Champion

April 2019 , Page 54 

Search the Champion Looking for something specific?

Preview of Member Only Content

For full access: login or Become a Member Join Now

Current Report on Recording Custodial Interrogations in the United States

By Thomas P. Sullivan

In 2002, only two states mandated statewide recording requirements for law enforcement departments when interrogating persons in custody — Alaska and Minnesota, both by decisions of their Supreme Courts. Not a single state legislature required recording, nor did the U.S. Department of Justice. A major change has taken place in the ensuing years. Now, as shown by the chart accompanying this article, 26 states and the District of Columbia have statutory, judicial, or self-imposed requirements that police questioning of arrested persons held in custody must be electronically recorded, either by audio or video or both.

The statewide statutes and court rulings vary according to a number of factors, including whether the recordings must be by audio, video or both; which crimes trigger the recording requirement; what circumstances excuse recording; and the courtroom consequences of failing to abide by the laws and rules. The hope is that in each passing year additional states will be added to

Want to read more?

The Champion archive is reserved for NACDL members.

NACDL members, please login to read the rest of this article.

Not a member? Join now.
Join Now
Or click here to see an overview of NACDL Member benefits.

See what NACDL members say about us.

To read the current issue of The Champion in its entirety, click here.

  • Media inquiries: Contact NACDL's Director of Public Affairs & Communications Ivan J. Dominguez at 202-465-7662 or idominguez@nacdl.org
  • Academic Requests: Full articles of The Champion Magazine are available for academic and research purposes in the WestLaw and LexisNexis databases.
Advertisement Advertise with Us

In This Section

Advertisement Advertise with Us