☰ In this section

The Champion

June 2017 , Page 45 

Search the Champion Looking for something specific?

Preview of Member Only Content

For full access: login or Become a Member Join Now

Practice Points: The General Credibility Instruction: We Can Do Better

By Lisa J. Steele

Read more Practice Points columns.

In any trial, the jury decides who and how much to believe. Its decision is sacred — appellate courts will not intercede in a credibility issue unless no reasonable juror could have believed a particular witness. In a criminal case, most, if not all, of the witnesses are prosecution witnesses. A jury’s decision that some of those witnesses are liars or just wrong may be the only defense that counsel can offer. This means that the credibility instruction is important. Do lawyers treat it as important?

The assumption has long been that credibility decisions are a natural, common-sense decision. Jurors are given one of several versions of a general credibility instruction that was developed by judicial experience and intuition. To counsel, they are often aural wallpaper — something the judge says in every case. Requests for special credibility instructions for eyewitnesses, accomplices, and jailhouse informants are not uncommon. However, lawyers rarely make requests t

Want to read more?

The Champion archive is reserved for NACDL members.

NACDL members, please login to read the rest of this article.

Not a member? Join now.
Join Now
Or click here to see an overview of NACDL Member benefits.

See what NACDL members say about us.

To read the current issue of The Champion in its entirety, click here.

  • Media inquiries: Contact NACDL's Director of Public Affairs & Communications Ivan J. Dominguez at 202-465-7662 or idominguez@nacdl.org
  • Academic Requests: Full articles of The Champion Magazine are available for academic and research purposes in the WestLaw and LexisNexis databases.
Advertisement Advertise with Us

In This Section

Advertisement Advertise with Us