☰ In this section

The Champion

March 2006 , Page 28 

Search the Champion Looking for something specific?

Preview of Member Only Content

For full access: login or Become a Member Join Now

The Controlled Substance Tax: Analysis, Argument & Attack

By Richard L. Holcomb

“Zaccheaus, come down from that sycamore tree.” Luke 19:5

This article prepares criminal defense lawyers to attack various state legislative mandates demanding assessments for possession, sale, and/or delivery of controlled substances. The tax assessment, levies and liens, generally become operational in federal drug cases, or in state drug cases.  

[Copyright © The Law Offices of James A.H. Bell, P.C. 2005]

Recently, Tennessee joined a number of states that have passed tax liability legislation1 to allow for the assessment of an excise tax on the possession of controlled substances. The Controlled Substance Tax (CST) is state based, operational in federal drug prosecutions, and can result in life term judgment against the taxpayer. Collection is routed through the enforcement procedures act.2 Efforts to stay collection are found in a separate series of legislative procedures.3 Alabama, Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, L

Want to read more?

The Champion archive is reserved for NACDL members.

NACDL members, please login to read the rest of this article.

Not a member? Join now.
Join Now
Or click here to see an overview of NACDL Member benefits.

See what NACDL members say about us.

To read the current issue of The Champion in its entirety, click here.

  • Media inquiries: Contact NACDL's Director of Public Affairs & Communications Ivan J. Dominguez at 202-465-7662 or idominguez@nacdl.org
  • Academic Requests: Full articles of The Champion Magazine are available for academic and research purposes in the WestLaw and LexisNexis databases.
Advertisement Advertise with Us

In This Section

Advertisement Advertise with Us