Preview of Member Only Content
For full access: or Become a Member
When It Comes to Overcriminalization, Prosecutorial Discretion Is for the Birds (Inside NACDL)
By Norman L. Reimer
Inside NACDL columns.
The annual White Collar issue of The Champion is an apt time to reflect on noteworthy developments of the past year. From a public policy standpoint, and from the perspective of those who are the subject of investigation and prosecution, the phenomenon broadly defined as overcriminalization is a growing problem. Overcriminalization includes many troubling trends: multiple, overlapping criminal provisions; inadequate definition of precisely what conduct is criminal in those provisions; the erosion of intent requirements; excessive penalties; and a general imbalance that imbues the prosecution with disparate power that chills and sometimes impedes an accused’s capacity to mount a defense. NACDL works with allies from across the ideological spectrum to pursue a multi-faceted strategy to combat each of these trends. Notable cases from the past year underscore the importance of this initiative.
In response to reform efforts, whether it is to limit the enactment of new criminal
Want to read more?
The Champion archive is reserved for NACDL members.
NACDL members, please login to read the rest of this article.
Not a member? Join now.
Or click here to see an overview of NACDL Member benefits.
See what NACDL members say about us.
To read the current issue of The Champion in its entirety, click here.
- Media inquiries: Contact NACDL's Director of Public Affairs & Communications Ivan J. Dominguez at 202-465-7662 or email@example.com
- Academic Requests: Full articles of The Champion Magazine are available for academic and research purposes in the WestLaw and LexisNexis databases.