Preview of Member Only Content
For full access: or Become a Member
The Battle Between Grand Jury Subpoenas and Civil Protective Orders: The Circuit Splits Persist
By John F. Fatino
Cover Story columns.
In a battle between a federal grand jury subpoena and a civil protective order, which one would prevail? Perhaps it may come as a surprise, but the answer to this important question may turn on the federal circuit in which the dispute is pending. In June 2011 the U.S. Supreme Court had the opportunity to resolve this lingering conflict. It refused to tackle the issue, and thus the circuit split continues to persist. This article discusses the different rules employed by the federal courts of appeals in assessing the relationship between civil protective orders and grand jury subpoenas.1
A. Know the Rules
Rule 26(c)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides: “A party or any person from whom discovery is sought may move for a protective order. … The court may, for good cause, issue an order to protect a party or person from annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or expense.”2 This rule grants federal district courts broad disc
Want to read more?
The Champion archive is reserved for NACDL members.
NACDL members, please login to read the rest of this article.
Not a member? Join now.
Or click here to see an overview of NACDL Member benefits.
See what NACDL members say about us.
To read the current issue of The Champion in its entirety, click here.
- Media inquiries: Contact NACDL's Director of Public Affairs & Communications Ivan J. Dominguez at 202-465-7662 or firstname.lastname@example.org
- Academic Requests: Full articles of The Champion Magazine are available for academic and research purposes in the WestLaw and LexisNexis databases.