☰ In this section

The Champion

March 2003 , Page 34 

Search the Champion Looking for something specific?

Preview of Member Only Content

For full access: login or Become a Member Join Now

Fourth Amendment Forum

By Milton Hirsch

Is profiling a constitutionally-permissible weapon in the War on Terror? Yes

Let's start with a simple quiz: Suppose that the National Traffic Safety Board has determined, after an exhaustive study and in the face of overwhelming empirical data, that the new Jeep Hindenberg rolls over and explodes. In light of this information, the federal government should: 

a. Order the immediate recall of all current model Jeep Hindenbergs; or 

b. Order all automobile manufacturers GM, Ford, Chrysler, Mercedes, Toyota, etc. etc. to recall every tenth car at random. Recalling only Jeep Hindenbergs would violate the Equal Protection principle, and it might hurt some people's feelings. 

If you checked "a," you're ready to have a serious discussion about profiling. (If you look across the page, you'll see that my partner David wants you to check "b." Would you buy a Jeep Hindenberg from him?)  

Ready or not, serious discussion about profiling is underway. If the criminal defense bar is unwilling

Want to read more?

The Champion archive is reserved for NACDL members.

NACDL members, please login to read the rest of this article.

Not a member? Join now.
Join Now
Or click here to see an overview of NACDL Member benefits.

See what NACDL members say about us.

To read the current issue of The Champion in its entirety, click here.

  • Media inquiries: Contact NACDL's Director of Public Affairs & Communications Ivan J. Dominguez at 202-465-7662 or idominguez@nacdl.org
  • Academic Requests: Full articles of The Champion Magazine are available for academic and research purposes in the WestLaw and LexisNexis databases.
Advertisement Advertise with Us

In This Section

Advertisement Advertise with Us