Preview of Member Only Content
For full access: or Become a Member
A Path Forward: Where Are We Now?
By Jennifer Friedman
In February 2009, the National Academy of Sciences (NAS), the most prestigious scientific organization in the country, issued a landmark report titled Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward (NAS Report). After studying and evaluating a number of different forensic science disciplines, the NAS concluded, “With the exception of nuclear DNA analysis … no forensic method has been rigorously shown to have the capacity to consistently, and with a high degree of certainty, demonstrate a connection between evidence and a specific individual or source.”1 The report concluded that there was in fact little science in many of the forensic science disciplines. Moreover, “much forensic evidence — including, for example, bite marks and firearm and toolmark identifications — is introduced in criminal trials without any meaningful scientific validation, determination of error rates, or reliability testing to explain the limits of the discipline.”2 This report is
Want to read more?
The Champion archive is reserved for NACDL members.
NACDL members, please login to read the rest of this article.
Not a member? Join now.
Or click here to see an overview of NACDL Member benefits.
See what NACDL members say about us.
To read the current issue of The Champion in its entirety, click here.
- Media inquiries: Contact NACDL's Director of Public Affairs & Communications Ivan J. Dominguez at 202-465-7662 or email@example.com
- Academic Requests: Full articles of The Champion Magazine are available for academic and research purposes in the WestLaw and LexisNexis databases.