Preview of Member Only Content
For full access: or Become a Member
More Polizzi and Jury 'Rectification'
By Jeffrey Buckels
Informal Opinion columns.
In the July 2009 issue of The Champion, I made note of the groundbreaking opinion of Judge Jack Weinstein in a child pornography case, United States v. Polizzi.1 The case, from the Eastern District of New York, involved multiple counts of possessing and receiving images over the Internet. Judge Weinstein had ruled that, in conjunction with a defense plea for jury nullification, the Sixth Amendment did not require that the jury be made aware of the five-year mandatory minimum sentence for convictions of receiving child porn images. Following the convictions, however, Judge Weinstein reversed himself on this point and granted a new trial.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed this grant of a new trial in United States v. Polouizzi aka Polizzi.2 In a decision of great importance, quite apart from the nullification matter, the court of appeals sharply reduced the permissible scope of indictments in Internet child porn cases, ruling that possessing a collection of images
Want to read more?
The Champion archive is reserved for NACDL members.
NACDL members, please login to read the rest of this article.
Not a member? Join now.
Or click here to see an overview of NACDL Member benefits.
See what NACDL members say about us.
To read the current issue of The Champion in its entirety, click here.
- Media inquiries: Contact NACDL's Director of Public Affairs & Communications Ivan J. Dominguez at 202-465-7662 or email@example.com
- Academic Requests: Full articles of The Champion Magazine are available for academic and research purposes in the WestLaw and LexisNexis databases.