Preview of Member Only Content
For full access: or Become a Member
Montejo and the Supreme Courts Limits on The Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel
By David L. McColgin
The Supreme Court’s decision in Montejo v. Louisiana1 last term is an assault on the attorney-client relationship. Under Montejo, police may now interrogate defendants in the absence of counsel, even after charges have been brought and counsel has been appointed or retained, as long as the defendants waive their rights under Miranda.2 Montejo, a 5-4 split decision, overrules the longstanding precedent of Michigan v. Jackson,3 which held that once a defendant requests counsel at an initial appearance in court, police may not initiate any interrogation.
This article discusses Montejo and what defense counsel can do in its aftermath to protect their clients’ Sixth Amendment right to counsel. The most important action counsel can take is to be sure clients expressly assert their right to remain silent and right to counsel by advising them to sign a formal “Assertion of Rights” form at their initial appearance in court. The use of such a form should become a routine part of criminal defense
Want to read more?
The Champion archive is reserved for NACDL members.
NACDL members, please login to read the rest of this article.
Not a member? Join now.
Or click here to see an overview of NACDL Member benefits.
See what NACDL members say about us.
To read the current issue of The Champion in its entirety, click here.
- Media inquiries: Contact NACDL's Director of Public Affairs & Communications Ivan J. Dominguez at 202-465-7662 or email@example.com
- Academic Requests: Full articles of The Champion Magazine are available for academic and research purposes in the WestLaw and LexisNexis databases.