Preview of Member Only Content
For full access: or Become a Member
Part One: Essential cases to know in handling challenges to scientific evidence
By Leonard Stamm
Defenders of persons accused of drunk driving today must not only be
counselors, consolers, legal advisors, litigators, legal researchers,
writers, investigators, and strategists, they must also be prepared to
confront an ever widening array of scientific procedures and tests
offered against defendants in court and at driver licensing hearings
which are designed to prove their client’s guilt. Attorneys must
understand scientific techniques and how to question reliability,
accuracy, and validity, and at the same time must understand the laws
and be able to navigate through a maze of contradictory and confusing
cases, to see the client through to an acquittal. This article attempts
to traverse the labyrinth of cases that can be used by a skilled lawyer
to obtain an acquittal or at least suppression or limitation of the
state’s scientific evidence.
A review of the numerous cases relating to challenges to scientific
evidence leads to a number of observations.
Want to read more?
The Champion archive is reserved for NACDL members.
NACDL members, please login to read the rest of this article.
Not a member? Join now.
Or click here to see an overview of NACDL Member benefits.
See what NACDL members say about us.
To read the current issue of The Champion in its entirety, click here.
- Media inquiries: Contact NACDL's Director of Public Affairs & Communications Ivan J. Dominguez at 202-465-7662 or email@example.com
- Academic Requests: Full articles of The Champion Magazine are available for academic and research purposes in the WestLaw and LexisNexis databases.