Preview of Member Only Content
For full access: or Become a Member
Direct harm to the privilege from complying with government policy: The McKesson case
By Kathryn Keneally
White-Collar Crime columns.
The Department of Justice has a policy of encouraging corporations that
are under criminal investigation to waive the protections of the
attorney-client privilege and work product immunity as a demonstration
of the corporation’s “timely and voluntary disclosure of wrongdoing and
its willingness to cooperate in the investigation of its agents.”1 This
policy, originally set out by then-Deputy Attorney General Eric Holder
in what has come to be known as the Holder Memorandum, and recently
reiterated by Deputy Attorney General Larry D. Thompson, is the subject
of a thorough discussion in another article in this issue of The Champion.2 The recent district court opinion in United States v. Bergonzi3 provides a ready illustration of the real-world ramifications of this misguided policy.
McKesson corporation’s cooperation
The defendants in Bergonzi are two former executives of HBO & Company. As described in the Bergonzi decision, in early 1999, HBO was acquired by the M
Want to read more?
The Champion archive is reserved for NACDL members.
NACDL members, please login to read the rest of this article.
Not a member? Join now.
Or click here to see an overview of NACDL Member benefits.
See what NACDL members say about us.
To read the current issue of The Champion in its entirety, click here.
- Media inquiries: Contact NACDL's Director of Public Affairs & Communications Ivan J. Dominguez at 202-465-7662 or email@example.com
- Academic Requests: Full articles of The Champion Magazine are available for academic and research purposes in the WestLaw and LexisNexis databases.