Preview of Member Only Content
For full access: or Become a Member
By Barry Tarlow
RICO Report columns.
Stubbornness as a defense to intent and creative use of expert testimony
Easily led and stubborn. Perhaps not a particularly good combination of
attributes to have if you happen to be a defendant accused of fraud.
However, with a qualified expert witness, they can be the basis of an
In a unanimous opinion authored by Judge Myron Bright of the Eighth Circuit sitting by designation, the Ninth Circuit reversed a conviction for bank fraud based on the district judge's rejection of psychiatric testimony that the defendant was easily led to credit facts that he wished to believe and then prone to stubborn intransigence in his beliefs and not easily amenable to rational persuasion. The panel affirmed that this testimony was not only admissible but, if credited by the jury, would have undermined the prosecution's contention that Finley acted with the specific intent to defraud. United States v. Finley, 301 F.3d 1000 (9th Cir. 2002). Although the holding is capable o
Want to read more?
The Champion archive is reserved for NACDL members.
NACDL members, please login to read the rest of this article.
Not a member? Join now.
Or click here to see an overview of NACDL Member benefits.
See what NACDL members say about us.
To read the current issue of The Champion in its entirety, click here.
- Media inquiries: Contact NACDL's Director of Public Affairs & Communications Ivan J. Dominguez at 202-465-7662 or firstname.lastname@example.org
- Academic Requests: Full articles of The Champion Magazine are available for academic and research purposes in the WestLaw and LexisNexis databases.