Preview of Member Only Content
For full access: or Become a Member
By John Balazs
Practice Points columns.
Rule 29: A Nuts and Bolts Guide to Judgments of Acquittal
A successful motion under Fed. R. Crim. P. 29 for judgment of acquittal is the equivalent to winning a not guilty verdict and bars the government from retrying your client. But the rule has a few counterintuitive traps that can snare a careless attorney, especially one used to state court practice where the rules can be quite different. This article is designed as a practical guide to making and successfully litigating Rule 29 motions and to avoiding potential land mines.
The standard for evaluating a Rule 29 motion is the same as the standard used in evaluating whether the evidence is sufficient to sustain the verdict: whether viewing all the evidence in the light most favorable to the government, any rational jury could find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.1 On appeal, the court will uphold a conviction if the evidence, including evidence that was erroneously admitted, was sufficient to sustain the verdi
Want to read more?
The Champion archive is reserved for NACDL members.
NACDL members, please login to read the rest of this article.
Not a member? Join now.
Or click here to see an overview of NACDL Member benefits.
See what NACDL members say about us.
To read the current issue of The Champion in its entirety, click here.
- Media inquiries: Contact NACDL's Director of Public Affairs & Communications Ivan J. Dominguez at 202-465-7662 or email@example.com
- Academic Requests: Full articles of The Champion Magazine are available for academic and research purposes in the WestLaw and LexisNexis databases.