Preview of Member Only Content
For full access: or Become a Member
The Arar Inquiry: Canada Faces a Case of Torture
By Steven Skurka
Northern Lights columns.
“Let us be clear: torture can never be an instrument to fight terror, for torture is an instrument of terror.”
– Kofi Annan, Secretary General of the United Nations
Dec. 10, 2005
Prior to the events of 9/11, the use of torture as an evidence-gathering
tool was wholly contrary to the Canadian legal system and the
principles espoused by a constitutional democracy. Recent times,
however, have shown a startling acquiescence by the public, politicians,
and indeed some academics to the use of “reasonable” torture. Debates
have focused not on the absolute prohibition of torture, but rather just
how much torture is tolerable in certain circumstances. Any discussion
about basic human rights and civil liberties is quickly subsumed by
vocal concerns about public safety and security. They are the justified
collateral damage in the war against terrorism.
In Canada, the use of torture for “national security purposes” came to
light as a result of the detention and torture of
Want to read more?
The Champion archive is reserved for NACDL members.
NACDL members, please login to read the rest of this article.
Not a member? Join now.
Or click here to see an overview of NACDL Member benefits.
See what NACDL members say about us.
To read the current issue of The Champion in its entirety, click here.
- Media inquiries: Contact NACDL's Director of Public Affairs & Communications Ivan J. Dominguez at 202-465-7662 or email@example.com
- Academic Requests: Full articles of The Champion Magazine are available for academic and research purposes in the WestLaw and LexisNexis databases.