Preview of Member Only Content
For full access: or Become a Member
Border Shooting Provides Window of Opportuniy Regarding Mandatory Minimums
By Martin S. Pinales
President's Column columns.
There was a recent trial in Texas involving two border patrol agents who
shot an unarmed drug smuggler in the backside as he ran away from them.
Ignacio Ramos and Jose Alonso Compean fired 15 shots, and afterwards
they picked up the shell casings and decided not to report the incident.
The agents refused a plea deal, thinking no jury would convict “cops”
for shooting a Mexican.
Because of mandatory minimum sentencing statutes, Ramos and Compean
received lengthy prison sentences (11 and 12 years, respectively). These
sentences have sparked an outrage among grassroots organizations and
lawmakers. U.S. District Judge Kathleen Cardone denied a motion for the
two to remain free on bond pending appeal.
Supporters of the border agents have deemed the judge’s ruling a
“disgraceful act” and said the government should be ashamed for taking
the word of a drug smuggler. They have started a petition demanding a
presidential pardon for the two men now viewed by many as heroe
Want to read more?
The Champion archive is reserved for NACDL members.
NACDL members, please login to read the rest of this article.
Not a member? Join now.
Or click here to see an overview of NACDL Member benefits.
See what NACDL members say about us.
To read the current issue of The Champion in its entirety, click here.
- Media inquiries: Contact NACDL's Director of Public Affairs & Communications Ivan J. Dominguez at 202-465-7662 or email@example.com
- Academic Requests: Full articles of The Champion Magazine are available for academic and research purposes in the WestLaw and LexisNexis databases.